2013
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201200849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low‐density extraction solvent based solvent‐terminated dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for quantitative determination of ionizable pesticides in environmental waters

Abstract: A rapid, efficient, and new solvent terminated dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction technique coupled with HPLC was developed for selective extraction and analysis of s-triazine herbicides from environmental water samples. Important parameters influencing the extraction process including type and volume of extraction and disperser solvent, extraction time, sample pH, ionic strength, and extraction temperature were successfully optimized. Under the optimal conditions, there are excellent linear relationship… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A likely explanation for this would be that larger amounts of the extraction solvent decrease the polarity of the aqueous sample due to dissolution of the extraction solvent in the aqueous phase which leads to a decrease in the partition coefficient of analytes which can lead to decreased recoveries. 40 A statistical test was performed to evaluate if there were significant differences between the area values in the volume evaluation of [C 6 MIM][PF 6 ]. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the extraction solvent volume for all compounds.…”
Section: Selection Of Extraction and Disperser Solventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A likely explanation for this would be that larger amounts of the extraction solvent decrease the polarity of the aqueous sample due to dissolution of the extraction solvent in the aqueous phase which leads to a decrease in the partition coefficient of analytes which can lead to decreased recoveries. 40 A statistical test was performed to evaluate if there were significant differences between the area values in the volume evaluation of [C 6 MIM][PF 6 ]. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the extraction solvent volume for all compounds.…”
Section: Selection Of Extraction and Disperser Solventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alguns autores também têm destacado a contribuição da estrutura aromática do tolueno na extração de analitos insaturados. [21][22][23] Também foi observado que os analitos com os menores valores de Kow (Tabela 1), ou seja, os mais solúveis em água, foram menos extraídos. …”
Section: Solvente Extratorunclassified
“…Resultados semelhantes foram obtidos por Tolcha, Merdassa e Mergessa, 21 que também avaliaram o efeito da força iônica na extração desta classe de agrotóxicos em água por DLLME.…”
Section: Avaliação Da Força Iônica Do Meiounclassified
“…This highlights the usefulness of projection techniques not only to handle the data but also to optimize the sensing performance. The performance of SERS-based detection is competitive with a few works in the literature for detection of pesticides in real samples, most of them based on extraction and size exclusion methods in chromatography techniques [8,[34][35][36]. Koeber et al were able to detect triazine herbicides in river samples with a detection limit of 3.3 9 10 -10 mol/L for simazine by combining column size exclusion and adsorption chromatography [31].…”
Section: Probing Trace Levels Of Prometryn In Deionized and Tap Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few analytical methods are available that can reach such level of dilution, most of which involve chromatography experiments [7,8]. Electrochemical techniques are also employed in detecting prometryn, although electrochemical sensors based on mercury electrodes [9][10][11] have negative environmental implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%