2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low duplicability and network fragility of cancer genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
69
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although network topology-based properties such as hubs and modules are commonly used to identify disease genes (41)(42)(43)(44), the controllability perspective provides a complementary network analysis framework for network medicine. In particular, type-II nodes that are not distinguishable from existing network properties and without publications bias were still identified by our controllability framework as nodes of special interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although network topology-based properties such as hubs and modules are commonly used to identify disease genes (41)(42)(43)(44), the controllability perspective provides a complementary network analysis framework for network medicine. In particular, type-II nodes that are not distinguishable from existing network properties and without publications bias were still identified by our controllability framework as nodes of special interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, ample examples of gene diversification following duplication have been described and "gene duplicability," by which we mean the ability of genes to be preserved in a population following duplication, has been extensively studied (Davis and Petrov, 2004;Koonin et al, 2004;He and Zhang, 2006;Liang et al, 2008;Rambaldi et al, 2008;Makino et al, 2009;Woods et al, 2013). Studies published on a large array of species seem to converge on the idea that some duplicated genes are more likely to be preserved in a population, and as such to potentially contribute to functional innovation, than other genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going a step further in the reasoning, it has been hypothesized that mutations affecting these proteins should be particularly related to the insurgence of diseases. Some experimental validation of this prediction has been indeed obtained: Rambaldi and his group (Rambaldi D. et al, 2008) provided evidence that virtually all proteins having a degree higher than 80 in the human protein-protein interaction network are target of known cancer-related mutations. Similarly, Ortutay and Vihinen (Ortutay C. & Vihinen M. et al, 2009), after building an interaction network comprising all human proteins involved in immune response, found that the network hubs include known disease-causing genes as well as 26 new genes related to primary immunodeficiency.…”
Section: The Structure Of Protein Network: Hubsmentioning
confidence: 85%