2015
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/24/8/088503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low frequency noise and radiation response in the partially depleted SOI MOSFETs with ion implanted buried oxide

Abstract: Low frequency noise behaviors of partially depleted silicon-on-insulator (PDSOI) n-channel metal-oxide semiconductors (MOS) transistors with and without ion implantation into the buried oxide are investigated in this paper. Owing to ion implantation-induced electron traps in the buried oxide and back interface states, back gate threshold voltage increases from 44.48 V to 51.47 V and sub-threshold swing increases from 2.47 V/dec to 3.37 V/dec, while electron field effect mobility decreases from 475.44 cm2/V·s t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the band gap range (∆𝜑 p ) over which the interface traps contribute to the shift of threshold voltage is about ∆𝜑 p ≈ 𝜑 SI − 𝜑 WI ≈ 𝜑 f . [16] Therefore, the variation of interface trap densities (∆𝑁 it = 𝜑 f ∆𝐷 it , per unit area) can be then estimated, [17,18] as graphed in Fig. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the band gap range (∆𝜑 p ) over which the interface traps contribute to the shift of threshold voltage is about ∆𝜑 p ≈ 𝜑 SI − 𝜑 WI ≈ 𝜑 f . [16] Therefore, the variation of interface trap densities (∆𝑁 it = 𝜑 f ∆𝐷 it , per unit area) can be then estimated, [17,18] as graphed in Fig. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 𝜇 0 is the mobility prior to irradiation, 𝜂 is a fitting parameter which is about 6.56 × 10 −13 cm 2 in this work. The variation of threshold voltage results from the formation of interface traps and oxide trapped charges 018501-2 (𝑁 ox ), which can be calculated by [18,20]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the lowfrequency noise in MOS transistors is higher than the noise in BJTs, as one can see in Figure 15. In this figure, the data are for 134 nMOS transistors from [22,47,48,49,50,51,72,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123], and for 53 pMOS transistors from [47,52,86,…”
Section: Noise In Mos Transistorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input-referred voltage noise S V G (gate voltage 1/f noise at 1Hz) in silicon MOS transistors compared to the corresponding S V B in silicon npn BJTs. ( ) for nMOS transistors from[22,47,48,49,50,51,72,82,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123], ( ) for pMOS transistors from[47,52,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the instable state of these shallow electron traps, electrons can tunnel 056101-2 into or out of them easily after applying bias to the substrate terminal, thus leading to the hysteretic phenomenon in the back-gate 𝐼-𝑉 curve. [10][11][12]18] Figure 4 shows the forward and backward sweep back-gate transfer 𝐼-𝑉 curves of control and modified SOI devices. It is interesting that modified wafers A and B show the 𝐼-𝑉 curve hysteretic phenomenon, whereas the modified wafer C and the control one do not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%