“…On the other hand, the PN of QOSCs [31], especially the flicker PN, may suffer from a >10-dB degradation when compared with that of a single core [43]. Generally, active injection devices are commonly regarded as the main contributor to the flicker PN [30], [41]; however, QOSCs with passive coupling (e.g., transformer coupling with fundamental [44], [45], [46], [47], [48] or super-harmonics [32], [49], [50], or capacitive coupling [51], [52]) still exhibit poor 1/ f 3 PN. Recently, an introduction of additional capacitive coupling paths [53] in a series-coupled QVCO [22] demonstrated a low flicker PN in the single-gigahertz RF range with a balanced flicker noise injection from the switching devices.…”