The recent trend towards the use of low-power wide-area-networks (LPWAN) communication technologies in the Internet of Things such as SigFox, Lora and Weightless gives rise to promising applications in smart grids, smart city, smart logistics, etc. where tens of thousands of sensors in a large area are connected to a single gateway. However, to manage such a sheer number of deployed devices, solutions to provide over-the-air firmware updates are required. This paper analyses the feasibility of over-the-air (partial) software updates for three LPWAN technologies (LoRa,) and discusses the best suited update method for different scenarios: full system updates, application updates and network stack updates.The results indicate that full firmware upgrades consume a substantial amount of energy, especially for the lowest bit-rate LPWAN technologies such as SigFox which drains a single AA battery with 2% when performing a version update.However, technologies with a similar range (i.e. LoRa SF12) require only 0.12%.The trade-off between range and energy (or bit-rate) becomes clear when considering that the least sensitive technology (IEEE-802.15.4g-OFDM) consumes only 0.0001%. Partial updates require significantly less energy for all technolo- * Corresponding author Preprint submitted to Journal of Internet of Things September 19, 2018 gies. Adding a single application uses 6 to 38 times less energy compared to a firmware update, depending on the update method and LPWAN technology. Even partial network stack updates (i.e. MAC) cost 3 to 8 times less energy, making over-the-air updates feasible. Keywords: LPWAN; Internet-of-Things; partial over-the-air software updates; network management; SigFox; LoRa; IEEE-802.15.4g 1. Introduction In recent years low-power wide-area-networks (LPWAN) such as NB-IoT LoRa, SigFox and IEEE-802.15.4g gained increasing interest from industry and the scientific community in fields related to the Internet-of-Things (IoT). The promise of providing large coverage for low power devices is a key enabler for 5 many use cases in application domains such as smart grids, smart city, smart logistics, etc. because a single LPWAN gateway can serve thousands of sensors within a range of several kilometres. To this end, most LPWANs operate in the sub-1 GHz frequency bands and therefore experience less attenuation and multipath fading.10Although the increased range of LPWAN technologies is appealing for many use cases, LPWAN technologies also have disadvantages. (i) Firstly, they achieve a longer range by using more energy per transmitted bit. The coverage of LP-WAN devices is increased by using a lower modulation rate, effectively putting more energy in each transmitted bit (or symbol), thereby resulting in a higher 15 link budget. (ii) Secondly, low power operation is achieved by using a simple star topology, applying an ultra low radio duty cycle, and using a simple, non-synchronised lightweight medium access control protocol such as slotted aloha. As a result, most LPWAN devices only listen sporadica...