2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-rank and sparse decomposition based shape model and probabilistic atlas for automatic pathological organ segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although promising results were obtained for six of the OARs, segmentation of the rectum and femoral head remain a challenging task owing to a lack of distinct boundaries and intensity information. As indicated, deformable models have both benefits and drawbacks in handling the task of OAR segmentation; however, using model-based segmentation tools along with active contours, the shortcomings presented in this paper might be overcome [35][36][37]. A possible optimal solution could be using a coupled framework to utilize the benefits of both active contours and atlas-based algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although promising results were obtained for six of the OARs, segmentation of the rectum and femoral head remain a challenging task owing to a lack of distinct boundaries and intensity information. As indicated, deformable models have both benefits and drawbacks in handling the task of OAR segmentation; however, using model-based segmentation tools along with active contours, the shortcomings presented in this paper might be overcome [35][36][37]. A possible optimal solution could be using a coupled framework to utilize the benefits of both active contours and atlas-based algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, these techniques can be divided into three classifications: (i) pattern classification technique [12,16], (ii) region growing technique [1,11], and (iii) thresholding technique [10,13,14]. The pattern classification technique requires an extensive number of test information preparations and necessities to separate the components; thus, its handling time is longer [21,22,26]. It cannot meet the continuous requirements of the CAD framework in clinical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the precision of BUS segmentation directly affects the performance of the quantitative analysis and diagnosis of tumors. Segmentation is a common and crucial task in medical image analysis, and many medical image segmentation tasks share essentially similar segmentation approaches; however, comparing with medical image segmentation for other imaging modalities, e.g., computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography, BUS image segmentation is very challenging because (1) ultrasound image has very low quality due to the speckle noise, low contrast, low single noise ratio (SNR) and artifacts; (2) large variations of breast structures exists among patients, which make it difficult to apply the knowledge of anatomical structures; and (3) strong priors based on tumor shape, size and echo strength are important for organ segmentation [174,180] in other imaging modalities; but these features vary largely across patients and are difficult to be applied to BUS image segmentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%