Nation - Nationalismus - Postnation 1992
DOI: 10.7788/boehlau.9783412322151.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loyalitätsprobleme einer Grenzbevölkerung. Das Beispiel Niederländisch- Limburgs im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cornips and Knotter (2016: 163) describe the historical construction of Limburgish identity in the nineteenth and twentieth century as a process of "negative integration" or "integration through differentiation" in the Dutch nation-state, with which they mean that Limburgish identity emerged as an oppositional identity to the rest of the Dutch nation, while at the same time, 'being Limburgish' implied 'being Dutch' as well. This implication seems obvious to many people nowadays, even though Limburg was home to several separatist-minded individuals and movements up until World War II (Pabst 1992).…”
Section: Linguistic Landscaping In the Meuse-rhine Borderlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cornips and Knotter (2016: 163) describe the historical construction of Limburgish identity in the nineteenth and twentieth century as a process of "negative integration" or "integration through differentiation" in the Dutch nation-state, with which they mean that Limburgish identity emerged as an oppositional identity to the rest of the Dutch nation, while at the same time, 'being Limburgish' implied 'being Dutch' as well. This implication seems obvious to many people nowadays, even though Limburg was home to several separatist-minded individuals and movements up until World War II (Pabst 1992).…”
Section: Linguistic Landscaping In the Meuse-rhine Borderlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cornips and Knotter (2016, 163) describe the historical construction of Limburgish identity in the nineteenth and twentieth century as a process of "negative integration" or "integration through differentiation" in the Dutch nation-state, with which they mean that Limburgish identity emerged as an oppositional identity to the rest of the Dutch nation, while at the same time, 'being Limburgish' implied 'being Dutch' as well. This implication seems obvious to many people nowadays, even though Limburg was home to several separatistminded individuals and movements up until World War II (Pabst 1992).…”
Section: Linguistic Landscaping In the Meuse-rhine Borderlandmentioning
confidence: 99%