2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.387600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Evaluation of an automated computer-aided diagnosis system for the detection of masses on prior mammograms</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Petrick et al [115] studied the effectiveness of their mass-detection method in the detection of masses in prior mammograms. The dataset used included 92 images region growing after enhancement of contrast in the image.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrick et al [115] studied the effectiveness of their mass-detection method in the detection of masses in prior mammograms. The dataset used included 92 images region growing after enhancement of contrast in the image.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrick et al [36] assessed the effectiveness of their method for the detection of masses in the detection of the related regions in prior mammograms. A set of 92 images, including 54 malignant and 38 benign lesions from 37 cases (22 malignant and 15 benign) was used.…”
Section: Analysis Of Mammograms Acquired Prior To the Detection Of Brmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrick et al 21 assessed the effectiveness of their method for the detection of masses in the detection of the related regions in prior mammograms. A set of 92 images, including 54 malignant and 38 benign lesions from 37 cases (22 malignant and 15 benign) was used.…”
Section: Analysis Of Prior Mammogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%