1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.321573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Role of electron-phonon coupling in femtosecond laser damage of metals</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best fit to the experimental data was obtained for G ¼ 9 Â 10 16 W/m 3 K with an uncertainty of 62 Â 10 16 W/m 3 K. When values of G are within the error bar, the simulated and experimental X-ray diffraction efficiencies are in agreement, but when values of G lie outside the error bar, the simulation results start to deviate significantly from the experiment. The value of G is lower than those measured previously by Beaurepaire et al, 21 Wellershoff et al, 22 Saito et al, 23 Caffrey et al, 15 and Hopkins et al 24 (see Table II). In Table II it can be seen that a wide range of film thickness and fluencies have been used for the previous studies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best fit to the experimental data was obtained for G ¼ 9 Â 10 16 W/m 3 K with an uncertainty of 62 Â 10 16 W/m 3 K. When values of G are within the error bar, the simulated and experimental X-ray diffraction efficiencies are in agreement, but when values of G lie outside the error bar, the simulation results start to deviate significantly from the experiment. The value of G is lower than those measured previously by Beaurepaire et al, 21 Wellershoff et al, 22 Saito et al, 23 Caffrey et al, 15 and Hopkins et al 24 (see Table II). In Table II it can be seen that a wide range of film thickness and fluencies have been used for the previous studies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 51%
“…In the studies cited, different methods and observables have been used. Beaurepaire et al 21 detected electron and spin temperatures, Caffrey et al 15 and Hopkins et al 24 detected electron and lattice temperatures whereas the study by Wellershoff et al 22 is based on damage thresholds. The conditions in the measurement by Saito et al 23 mostly resemble ours in terms of film thickness and method, since they also observed an acoustic response in the lattice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 and references therein) reporting the g values of ∼2 × 10 16  W/m 3 K, which are quantitatively consistent with the present UED result. The g values reported for Cu (10 × 10 16  W/m 3 K) 2 and Mo (13 × 10 16  W/m 3 K) 34 are again much larger than that of Au, giving the qualitative similarity with UED. Quantitatively, however, they are somewhat smaller compared to the present work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…13,[15][16][17] However, there is growing experimental evidence that the applicability of the constant G-factor is limited to a low intensity laser pulses. [18][19][20] Kaganov et al 21) proposed a theoretical model of the G-factor with electron relaxation time that is defined as the inverse of the electron-phonon collision frequency and usually assumed to be proportional to 1=T e , forcing the G-factor to be constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%