2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luciferase protection against proteolytic degradation: A key for improving signal in nano-system biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapid decreases in luciferase activity during drug exposure could be construed as a cellular stress response in which proteolysis and amino acid release and/or selective translational inhibition is used to alter the proteome of the parasite [25,26]. Luciferase is particularly known to be susceptible to proteolytic degradation [27]. Nonetheless, the activity decrease was not affected by proteasome inhibitors, even though proteasomes are principally responsible for cytoplasmic protein turnover and homeostasis in mammalian cells [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid decreases in luciferase activity during drug exposure could be construed as a cellular stress response in which proteolysis and amino acid release and/or selective translational inhibition is used to alter the proteome of the parasite [25,26]. Luciferase is particularly known to be susceptible to proteolytic degradation [27]. Nonetheless, the activity decrease was not affected by proteasome inhibitors, even though proteasomes are principally responsible for cytoplasmic protein turnover and homeostasis in mammalian cells [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Western blot analysis confirmed that full‐length probes can be detected as major bands in expected molecular weight (Appendix Fig S1 ). One exception that YFP‐FKBP‐Luciferase displayed few degraded forms in lower molecular weight (Appendix Fig S1 ), probably due to previously reported proteolytic degradation (Ataei et al , 2009 ). Based on the size measurement using size exclusion chromatography, full‐length β‐Gal and three truncated β‐Gal proteins form hexamer (YFP‐FKBP‐β‐Gal: 659 kDa) and dimer (YFP‐FKBP‐β‐Gals: 230 kDa; YFP‐FKBP‐β‐Galm: 262 kDa; YFP‐FKBP‐∆Nβ‐Gal: 322 kDa), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After the incubation of the remote-loaded DPPC liposomes with CsPLA 2 (7 nM) for varying times, luciferase was added to the reaction mixture and the luminescence resulting from luciferase-luciferin raction was measured in order to follow CsPLA 2 -triggered luciferin release. The luminescent signal was only measured for a short time (5 s) at 37 C to avoid possible proteolysis of luciferase enzyme over time (Ataei et al, 2009). Unlike unloaded DPPC liposomes, which were quickly degraded by sPLA 2 (see Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%