2016 Ieee Autotestcon 2016
DOI: 10.1109/autest.2016.7589589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning anomaly detection in large systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies which use the autoencoder approach on the other hand, the number of different attributes used was 21 (Gomes et al, 2017), 18 (Domingos et al, 2016;Paula et al, 2016) and 10 (Schreyer et al, 2017). A reason for this could be that autoencoders can handle thousands of different dimensions (Murphree, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies which use the autoencoder approach on the other hand, the number of different attributes used was 21 (Gomes et al, 2017), 18 (Domingos et al, 2016;Paula et al, 2016) and 10 (Schreyer et al, 2017). A reason for this could be that autoencoders can handle thousands of different dimensions (Murphree, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An illustration of an autoencoder architecture is presented below in Figure 1 . Autoencoders have been widely used for dimensionality reduction applications [ 41 ], signal reconstruction applications, and anomaly detection applications [ 37 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [18] have proposed a data-driven risk management framework based on time series data analyses, while the frameworks presented by [3] and [19] respectively address energy saving and optimization and product life-cycle management and maintenance. With the goal of detecting the health of a system, [20] has applied anomaly detection algorithms to detect failure or a pending failure from the system measurements. A particular attention has also been paid to the application of Deep Learning models in prognostics (e.g., [19], [21]).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%