2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-to-machine communication for agricultural systems: An XML-based auxiliary language to enhance semantic interoperability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, researchers worldwide have conducted numerous studies to solve these heterogeneities in PA (Iftikhar and Pedersen, 2011;Schuster et al, 2011). However, a satisfactory solution for acquiring, integrating, processing, and distributing PA monitoring information interoperably over the WWW space from the physical sensor space remains unavailable.…”
Section: Background and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, researchers worldwide have conducted numerous studies to solve these heterogeneities in PA (Iftikhar and Pedersen, 2011;Schuster et al, 2011). However, a satisfactory solution for acquiring, integrating, processing, and distributing PA monitoring information interoperably over the WWW space from the physical sensor space remains unavailable.…”
Section: Background and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This cloud is designed based on the XML structure due to its reliable and easy capability (Sormaz et al 2010;Schuster et al 2011;Bohm and Kanne 2011;Jea, Chang, and Cheng 2011) for manufacturing data transformation. The XML Service Cloud, which is service-oriented approach, enables different manufacturing agents to collaborate with each other when they are distributed over the globe.…”
Section: Xml Service Cloudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One simple example provides some indication of the kind of focus required among cross disciplinary skills and task(s) to make such a shift in usage. Employment of methods like those of Milliken et al (2010) or Oliver (2010) indicates that usage of these mathematical approaches is limited because a comprehensive data processing and computing infrastructure for on-farm, in the field agricultural activities, does not exist (Schuster et al, 2011). We provide on example of the problem.…”
Section: Conclusion -Agricultural Laser Scanning's 'Trains and Troopsmentioning
confidence: 99%