“…The studies that served as the basis for determining the use of the Transition Design technique were those of Irwin, (2015), Juri et al (2021), Bosch-Gómez et al (2022), Cowart and Maione ( 2022), Irwin et al (2022) and Sanabria-Zepeda and Santana-Castellón (2022). The studies that served as guidance for the choice of an Ideathon to carry out the proof of concept of the platform with AI were those of the University of Washington (2016), Sanabria-Z et al (2020), Uesugi and Moriyama (2020), Barrow (2021), SIC (2021) and Yudina et al (2021) and the latter was key for the implementation because the recommendations regarding space, furniture, duration and the number of facilitators and instructors per mediation and room were considered. On the other hand, the studies by Castillo-Martínez et al (2022) and Alemán de la Garza (2019) were considered because they address the design and validation process of the instruments that were applied for the present study, the first corresponds to the eComplexity instrument to measure the perception of students regarding their level of mastery of the complex thinking competency and the second corresponds to the Diapason instrument, which allows measuring the perception of the interactive experience with the platform.…”