2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs6053923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAD-MEX: Automatic Wall-to-Wall Land Cover Monitoring for the Mexican REDD-MRV Program Using All Landsat Data

Abstract: 3924 manner by automatic image classification. This paper describes the operational land cover monitoring system for Mexico. It utilizes national-scale cartographic reference data, all available Landsat satellite imagery, and field inventory data for validation. Seven annual national land cover maps between 1993 and 2008 were produced. The classification scheme defined 9 and 12 classes at two hierarchical levels. Overall accuracies achieved were up to 76%. Tropical and temperate forest was classified with accu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
59
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, because the MAD-MEX classification scheme does not take into account the degradation level of forest covers, this monitoring system is not seen to be appropriate to assess either the area or the rate of forest degradation, nor can it be used to monitor degradation in Mexico over time. Although we acknowledge the considerable difficulty of degradation detection using available remote sensing historical datasets, this key limitation was not discussed by Gebhardt et al [1]. Indeed, detecting degradation is one of the most pressing problems as regards building the necessary baselines and MRV systems for REDD+ [14,15].…”
Section: Inconsistency In Monitoring Land Cover Changementioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, because the MAD-MEX classification scheme does not take into account the degradation level of forest covers, this monitoring system is not seen to be appropriate to assess either the area or the rate of forest degradation, nor can it be used to monitor degradation in Mexico over time. Although we acknowledge the considerable difficulty of degradation detection using available remote sensing historical datasets, this key limitation was not discussed by Gebhardt et al [1]. Indeed, detecting degradation is one of the most pressing problems as regards building the necessary baselines and MRV systems for REDD+ [14,15].…”
Section: Inconsistency In Monitoring Land Cover Changementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gebhardt et al [1] claim that the MAD-MEX accuracy assessment procedure follows the protocol described by Olofsson et al [2] using a random area-weighted stratified sampling. However, they selected validation data from a reference dataset, which is not randomly distributed within the different categories of the MAD-MEX maps.…”
Section: Bias In Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations