2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnesium isotopes: a tool to understand self-enrichment in globular clusters

Abstract: A critical issue in the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) self-enrichment scenario for the formation of multiple populations in Globular Clusters (GCs) is the inability to reproduce the magnesium isotopic ratios, despite the model in principle can account for the depletion of magnesium. In this work we analyze how the uncertainties on the various p-capture cross sections affect the results related to the magnesium content of the ejecta of AGB stars. The observed distribution of the magnesium isotopes and of the ov… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result the P2 fraction may be unusually high in NGC 6402, especially when compared against the NGC 2808 P2 component that constitutes only 25 per cent of the Carretta (2015) sample. Shetrone 1996;Yong et al 2003;Sneden et al 2004;Da Costa et al 2013;Ventura et al 2018). Although the P2 gas could have been burned at higher temperatures and then diluted with "pristine" P1 composition material, no single dilution model fits through the P1, P2, and E populations shown in Fig.…”
Section: Population Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result the P2 fraction may be unusually high in NGC 6402, especially when compared against the NGC 2808 P2 component that constitutes only 25 per cent of the Carretta (2015) sample. Shetrone 1996;Yong et al 2003;Sneden et al 2004;Da Costa et al 2013;Ventura et al 2018). Although the P2 gas could have been burned at higher temperatures and then diluted with "pristine" P1 composition material, no single dilution model fits through the P1, P2, and E populations shown in Fig.…”
Section: Population Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first generation stars are characterized as having light element compositions that mirror those of similar metallicity halo field stars (e.g., Sneden et al 2004) while the second generation groups tend to have lower C, O, and Mg abundances and higher He, N, Na, and Al abundances. Aside from a general consensus that second generation stars likely formed from gas that was processed at temperatures exceeding 40−80 MK (e.g., Langer et al 1993;Prantzos et al 2007;Denissenkov et al 2015;Ventura et al 2018), little agreement exists regarding the origins of the (anti-)correlated light element variations. Various enrichment sites have been proposed, including intermediate mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars (e.g., Ventura & D'Antona 2009;Karakas et al 2014), fast rotating massive stars (e.g., Decressin et al 2007;Krause et al 2013), interacting massive binary stars (de Mink et al 2009;Bastian et al 2013), Wolf-Rayet stars (Smith 2006), white dwarf novae (Maccarone & Zurek 2012), black hole accretion disks (Breen 2018), and supermassive stars (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gay & Lambert 2000;Yong et al 2003;Meléndez & Cohen 2009;Agafonova et al 2011). Comparisons between GCE models and observations have been used for example to constrain star formation rates on cosmological timescales (Vangioni & Olive 2019), to determine the onset of the contribution of AGB stars to GCE (Fenner et al 2003;Meléndez & Cohen 2007), to establish the timescale for the formation of the Galactic halo (Carlos et al 2018), or to understand self-enrichment in globular clusters (Ventura et al 2018). All three stable magnesium isotopes can be formed in both massive and intermediate-mass stars, however massive stars are not able to produce the heavier isotopes 25,26 Mg in significant amounts (see Timmes et al 1995;Alibés et al 2001), as opposed to low-metallicity AGB stars (Karakas & Lattanzio 2003).…”
Section: Preliminary Exploration Of the Implications On Galactic Chemical Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• understanding the role played by intermediate-mass stars in the self-enrichment scenario of globular clusters. [25][26][27][28][29][30] 2.2 A recent use of our AGB models: interpretation of the extreme He-rich population of NGC2808 Recently, we focused on the chemical composition of stars belonging to the extreme He-rich population of NGC2808 populated by stars with the most extreme abundance of Mg, Al, Na, O, and Si. We checked whether the most recent measures are consistent with the AGB yields of stars of 6.5 -8M .…”
Section: Our Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%