2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011119)40:22<4207::aid-anie4207>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Interactions as Supramolecular Function: Structure and Magnetic Properties of Hydrogen-Bridged Dinuclear Copper(II) Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,[28][29][30] The magnetic susceptibility data for these two complexes were simultaneously fitted by full-matrix diagonalisation of the following spin Hamiltonian: 31 23,[28][29][30] The magnetic susceptibility data for these two complexes were simultaneously fitted by full-matrix diagonalisation of the following spin Hamiltonian: 31…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,[28][29][30] The magnetic susceptibility data for these two complexes were simultaneously fitted by full-matrix diagonalisation of the following spin Hamiltonian: 31 23,[28][29][30] The magnetic susceptibility data for these two complexes were simultaneously fitted by full-matrix diagonalisation of the following spin Hamiltonian: 31…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other examples of complexes that exhibit some of these features individually. A copper Schiff base dimer is held together by hydrogen bonding but lacks the other structural elements [48]. The π-π stacking feature is observed in imidazole based supramolecular complexes of manganese(II) and cobalt(II) [49].…”
Section: Structures Of the Complexes General Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Other possible pathway for exchange coupling would be the hydrogen bonding that relates the closest Cu1A and Cu1B centres in 5. The presence of even relatively intense magnetic coupling in hydrogen bonded Cu(II)-monomeric compounds has been discussed both in experimental 39 and theoretical studies. 40 Taking into account the presence of weak antiferromagnetic coupling in 5 despite the very short Cu···Cu distance in its structure, we suggest that the magnetic interactions in 1, clearly stronger than those in 5, are mainly intradinuclear in nature.…”
Section: (Hcmp)(clo 4 )(H 2 O) and (Cul´) 2 (Hcmp)(clo 4 )(H 2 O)mentioning
confidence: 99%