2015
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201500092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Levitational Assembly for Living Material Fabrication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These advantages include the ability to create geometrically complex scaffolds containing viable cells [18,19,21], efficiency, low cost [22], high throughput [23], precise reproducibility [18], and limited need for specialized training. High-throughput fabrication of 3D structures is currently limited with traditional microfabrication techniques that generate 2D building blocks and rely on layer-by-layer assembly to form 3D structures [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Current methods for co-culturing multiple cell types in desired configurations lack high-throughput capabilities, demanding multiple labor-intensive fabrication steps [23], but spatial patterning of different cell types or ECM components is possible using various 'bio-inks' for printing [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages include the ability to create geometrically complex scaffolds containing viable cells [18,19,21], efficiency, low cost [22], high throughput [23], precise reproducibility [18], and limited need for specialized training. High-throughput fabrication of 3D structures is currently limited with traditional microfabrication techniques that generate 2D building blocks and rely on layer-by-layer assembly to form 3D structures [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Current methods for co-culturing multiple cell types in desired configurations lack high-throughput capabilities, demanding multiple labor-intensive fabrication steps [23], but spatial patterning of different cell types or ECM components is possible using various 'bio-inks' for printing [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, using magnetically functionalized electrospun matrices with magnetic nanoparticles [23] as well as using tissue spheroids biofabricated from cells labelled with magnetic nanoparticles [24][25][26][27] will enable the development of novel magnetic 3D bioprinting technology based on principles of magnetic levitation or translocation of tissue constructs using magnetic forces [28][29][30] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that tissue spheroids can attach, spread and fuse on synthetic electrospun matrices [21,22] . Moreover, recently reported magnetic functionalization of electrospun synthetic matrices with magnetic nanoparticles [23] as well as biofabrication of tissue spheroids from cells labelled with magnetic nanoparticles [24][25][26][27] allow the development of magnetic forcesdriven biofabrication and even 3D magnetic bioprinting based on principles of magnetic levitation [28][29][30] . Thus, application of nanotechnology can enable development of novel technology of magnetic 3D bioprinting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[81] The developed scaffold was later implanted in a bone defect model of New Zealand white rabbits. [81] The study aimed at assessing osteogenesis upon the application of an external static magnetic field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[81] The developed scaffold was later implanted in a bone defect model of New Zealand white rabbits. [81] The study aimed at assessing osteogenesis upon the application of an external static magnetic field. The scaffolds under the external magnetic field promoted higher osteocalcin expression in the bone defect, faster achievement of cortical bone and medullar cavity continuity when compared to scaffolds without magnetic stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%