1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00654348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic properties of sheet silicates; 2:1:1 layer minerals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent single Fe 2+ doublet must consist of unresolved doublets due to Fe 2+ in M(1) and M(2) of the 2:1 layer and M(3) of the interlayer sheet. Support for this interpretation comes from Mrssbauer spectral studies of several Febearing chlorites by Ballet et al (1985) and Townsend et al (1986). Both sets of authors found they could not distinguish Fe TM ions in cis and trans octahedral sites of the 2:1 layer and in octahedral sites of the interlayer sheet.…”
Section: Octahedramentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The apparent single Fe 2+ doublet must consist of unresolved doublets due to Fe 2+ in M(1) and M(2) of the 2:1 layer and M(3) of the interlayer sheet. Support for this interpretation comes from Mrssbauer spectral studies of several Febearing chlorites by Ballet et al (1985) and Townsend et al (1986). Both sets of authors found they could not distinguish Fe TM ions in cis and trans octahedral sites of the 2:1 layer and in octahedral sites of the interlayer sheet.…”
Section: Octahedramentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hence, the easy direction lies in the plane. 6 is positive (30 K) and, from Eq. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], the exchange constant is J = l.25 K, counting only the six neighbors in the plane.…”
Section: -58 Other Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The susceptibility and magnetization are calculated by summing over the energy levels, weighting each by its Boltzmann factor, viz., 6 I m i exp (-E/kT) i= 1 <m> = 6 I exp (-E. IkT)…”
Section: -21 Susceptibility and Magnetization Of Iron(iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, trivalent cations tend to concentrate into the smaller M4 site. If the cations are disordered over the 2 sites, the symmetry can be monoclinic, whereas ordering of trivalent cations into M4 causes a difference (D) in the mean cation oxygen dis- (Taylor et al 1968;Coey 1975;Ericsson et al 1977;Goodman and Bain 1978;Blaauw et al 1980;Borggaard et al 1982;Kodama et al 1982;Ballet et al 1985;Raclavsk~i and Raclavsk# 1988;Aramu et al 1989;Christofides et al 1994) that are generally assigned to the M1 and M2 sites, but are recognized to be potentially indistinguishable from M3 and M4 doublets. In many of these studies (for example, Christofides et al t994), the authors were primarily interested in Fe(IU)/Fe(II) ratios, and so did not pursue more elaborate fitting schemes to determine Fe occupancy of the interlayer sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%