2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic properties of soils from sites with different geological and environmental settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend implies the presence of some influencing factors on χ lf and χ ARM , such as the lithogenic mineral concentrations found in various bedrock or sediment types. These differences have also been found by other researchers (Hanesch and Scholger, 2005;Fialova et al, 2006). In contrast, SIRM of soils derived from river alluvium was significantly higher than the other two categories, indicating that the magnetic mineral concentration of remanence-bearing minerals is higher in alluvial parent material.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Different Soil Categoriessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trend implies the presence of some influencing factors on χ lf and χ ARM , such as the lithogenic mineral concentrations found in various bedrock or sediment types. These differences have also been found by other researchers (Hanesch and Scholger, 2005;Fialova et al, 2006). In contrast, SIRM of soils derived from river alluvium was significantly higher than the other two categories, indicating that the magnetic mineral concentration of remanence-bearing minerals is higher in alluvial parent material.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Different Soil Categoriessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For example, soil developed from basalt usually has much higher susceptibility than other bedrock types because of its high background content of iron oxides (Thompson and Oldfield, 1986;Lu, 2000b;Wang et al, 2000;Rao et al, 2007). Previous studies have concluded that, overall, parent material is a critical factor determining the type and concentration of magnetic minerals (Fialova et al, 2006;Blundell et al, 2009a). Other natural factors, such as climate, topography, water regime, organisms, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study area, the soil magnetic susceptibility (j) was lower (measurement with forest litter) or comparable and lower (measurement without forest litter) than the soil j values observed in other Polish and European industrial regions (Boyko et al 2004;Schmidt et al 2005;Fialová et al 2006;Magiera et al 2006a;Magiera and Zawadzki 2007;Wojas 2009). In the southern and central part of the study area, there were a few magnetic anomalies observed (i.e.…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibility Of Soilsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The magnetic properties of soils proved to be suitable parameters, as they reflect the various degrees of contamination due to human activities and allow us to detect the area most affected by pollution. The measurement of magnetic properties in samples taken in soil profiles enables: 1) acquisition of information about the boundary depth between polluted soil and clean soil (Blaha et al, 2008), 2) discrimination between anthropogenic and lithogenic contributions (Fialová et al, 2006;Magiera et al, 2006), 3) discovery of the underlying parent material's influence on the magnetic signal (Hanesch and Scholger, 2005), 4) understanding of the development of pedogenic processes (Jordanova et al, 2010;Maher et al, 2002) and 5) attainment of climate reconstructions (Alekseeva et al, 2007;Maher et al, 2002). In the present study, data from 6 soil profiles, which formed on diverse parent material and in different environments (rural/urban), are analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%