2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2012.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance contrast and biological effects of intracellular superparamagnetic iron oxides on human mesenchymal stem cells with long-term culture and hypoxic exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, a progressive decrease of intracellular Fe 3 O 4 NPs over increasing culture time was observed. As several reports have suggested, using different IONPs at various concentrations on BM‐MSCs cultured for 7‐14 days (Harrison et al, ; Mohanty et al, ; Rosenberg et al, ), we also believe that this apparent dilution effect of IONPs is to be attributed to cell division.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, a progressive decrease of intracellular Fe 3 O 4 NPs over increasing culture time was observed. As several reports have suggested, using different IONPs at various concentrations on BM‐MSCs cultured for 7‐14 days (Harrison et al, ; Mohanty et al, ; Rosenberg et al, ), we also believe that this apparent dilution effect of IONPs is to be attributed to cell division.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…To date, most in vitro Fe 3 O 4 NP toxicity information was derived from studies carried out on immortalized or tumorigenic cells (Coccini, Caloni, Ramírez Cando, & De Simone, ; Guadagnini, Moreau, Hussain, Marano, & Boland, ; Mahmoudi, Hofmann, Rutishauser, & Fink, ; Malvindi et al, ; Sanganeria, Sachar, et al, ). Recent studies have started to apply MSCs for Fe 3 O 4 NP toxicity evaluation (in terms of cytotoxicity, MSC differentiation capacity and iron uptake), which mostly derive from BM (Hachani et al, ; Harrison et al, ; Rosenberg et al, ), few from UC tissue (Dulinska‐Molak et al, ; Hu et al, ; Periasamy, Athinarayanan, Alhazmi, Alatiah, & Alshatwi, ) and only one from CL‐MSC (Sanganeria, Chandra, Bahadur, & Khanna, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze MRI detectability, MPIO‐labeled EB‐NPCs before and after cryopreservation were immobilized in agarose gels to provide a controlled tissue mimicking phantom for which T 2 and T 2 * relaxations were correlated with the initial MPIO exposure . The in vitro MRI measurements provide a controllable method of modeling contrast effects, which are critical to monitor the transplanted cells in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer this question, studies been performed using superparamagnetic iron oxides (SPIO) to mark hMSCs-UC in combination with an MRI technique 14; however, the MRI signal becomes weaker with the progressive differentiation of hMSCs-UC in the target tissue in the animal model, and therefore this method is not suitable for long-term observation. A recent study showed that higher dose SPIO labeling is stable for long-term MRI detection, but the labeling may limit the multi-lineage potential of hMSCs and affect their survival under serum and oxygen withdrawal 24. The daily clinical usage of gadolinium (Gd) based contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging is limited because of its nephrogenic toxicity 25.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%