1998
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199803000-00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Shoulder in Abduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies of subacromial clearance have not explicitly studied scapular motion but have either examined the effects of total humeral elevation in vivo (2,9,33) or the effects of glenohumeral motion in a cadaver model (3,8). Flatow et al (8) reported that subacromial soft tissues were in contact with the undersurface of the acromion during normal elevation of the humerus and that suprahumeral space gradually decreased with simulated active elevation of the arm using cadaver specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of subacromial clearance have not explicitly studied scapular motion but have either examined the effects of total humeral elevation in vivo (2,9,33) or the effects of glenohumeral motion in a cadaver model (3,8). Flatow et al (8) reported that subacromial soft tissues were in contact with the undersurface of the acromion during normal elevation of the humerus and that suprahumeral space gradually decreased with simulated active elevation of the arm using cadaver specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glenohumeral kinematics have been analyzed with standard radiographs, [7][8][9][10]12 magnetic resonance imaging, [13][14][15][16] ultrasound, 17 and computed tomography. 18 In most studies using these methods, images were taken with the GH joint held in static positions.…”
Section: Nvestigatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,25,38 Graichen et al 23,25 computed the minimum distance from the humerus to the acromion during abduction and rotation of the shoulder in normal subjects. In all 12 subjects, the minimum acromiohumeral distance vector penetrated the supraspinatus during 90°ab-duction with 45°internal rotation but passed lateral to the supraspinatus during pure abduction of 120°or greater.…”
Section: Subacromial Impingementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Biomechanical analyses of shoulder abduction and rotation predict that the Hawkins sign position should result in greater subacromial contact of the rotator cuff than the Neer sign position. 6,7,14,23,25,38 However, a recent in vivo study of asymptomatic volunteers did not observe subacromial contact of the rotator cuff in either the Neer or the Hawkins sign position. 35 Furthermore, whereas internal impingement in the Neer and Hawkins positions has been suggested by recent skeletal 12 and cadaveric 40 studies, this mechanism has not been demonstrated in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%