2017
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1293290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance-only simulation and dose calculation in external beam radiation therapy: a feasibility study for pelvic cancers

Abstract: According to the comparison, using pCT for clinical EBRT planning and dose calculation in the three investigated types of pelvic cancers is feasible. Further studies are required to demonstrate the applicability to a larger cohort of patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
49
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
49
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The dose deviations obtained in this study are in line with previously published studies on rectal cancer patients [21,22], which reported dose differences within 1.5% and to other studies in the pelvic area reporting dose differences within 2% [31,15,16]. As highlighted in the Supplementary material, the observed dose differences may be related to smaller body contour on sCT with respect to CT images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dose deviations obtained in this study are in line with previously published studies on rectal cancer patients [21,22], which reported dose differences within 1.5% and to other studies in the pelvic area reporting dose differences within 2% [31,15,16]. As highlighted in the Supplementary material, the observed dose differences may be related to smaller body contour on sCT with respect to CT images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Investigations into sCT generation mostly focused on brain and prostate cancer patients [16,17], with vendors recently providing certified solutions for prostate cancer radiotherapy [18][19][20]. Only two publications investigated the feasibility of MR-only radiotherapy calculations for rectal cancer patients [21,22]. These two contributions focused solely on the dosimetric accuracy of MR-based dose calculation without investigating the use of sCT as a reference for position verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional artifacts can derive from patient induced distortions, such as susceptibility and chemical shift. Previous studies have shown that with geometric accuracy better than 2 mm within the entire FOV it is possible to achieve clinically feasible dose calculation accuracy for MRI-only RTP [21,23,[38][39][40][41]. The geometric accuracy of the applied MR platforms was sufficient for MRI-only RT [10,11,21,23,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When focusing on the pelvis area, many methods have been proposed and evaluated for radiotherapy of prostate cancer (Edmund andNyholm 2017, Johnstone et al 2017), showing dose deviations below 2% with respect to CT-based dose calculations. Only three contributions investigated the accuracy of MR-based dose calculations for locations other than prostate within the pelvic area (Kemppainen et al 2017, Liu et al 2017, Wang et al 2018. Moreover, no attention has been specifically dedicated to the time required to generate sCT, which should be of the order of minutes to allow daily replanning during MRgRT as, for example, underlined by Raaymakers et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%