2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic reversal and domain structure in perpendicular AF-coupled films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can compare the energy difference between the laterally correlated (AF coupled) and vertically correlated (FM domain) remanent states. 6,19 For each remanent configuration the total energy can be expressed as the sum of the magnetostatic demagnetization, domain wall, and interlayer exchange energies:…”
Section: Page 11 Of 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can compare the energy difference between the laterally correlated (AF coupled) and vertically correlated (FM domain) remanent states. 6,19 For each remanent configuration the total energy can be expressed as the sum of the magnetostatic demagnetization, domain wall, and interlayer exchange energies:…”
Section: Page 11 Of 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] In [(Co/Pt) X-1 /Co/Ru] N multilayers, both vertically and laterally correlated domain states have been observed. 6,[18][19][20] The reversal modes are determined largely by the sample thickness and magnetization and by the strength of the AF interlayer coupling. In these samples, the competition between reversal modes is tuned by N, the number of Co/Pt stacks separated by Ru spacer layers, and X, the number of Co layers per Co/Pt stack ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in the domain size with decreasing thickness of the ultrathin ferromagnetic films is favorable energetically [13]. In the case of the Co/Pt and similar multilayer systems experiments find nonmonotonic w(d)-dependence (d is the total thickness of the multilayer), with the small-d limit in which w(d) is a decreasing function, and large-d limit in which w(d) increases [14,15]. In our experiment both samples are in a small-d limit.…”
Section: Domain Patternsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…3 plots͒. However, the perpendicular anisotropy should persist even in the thin film limit, 12,13 which is inconsistent with the observed in-plane magnetization near the end of the milling process. It is interesting to note that in Co thin films a similar transition from out-of-plane to in-plane magnetization has been observed after bombardment by 10 keV ͑Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%