1993
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(93)90087-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magneto-optical sensitivity functions of thin-film systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also expect that the Co layers have their polar component close to the saturated value everywhere except for low magnetic fields. Therefore, and represent MO contributions of Co films and the matrix is in the form (5) According to (4), we calculate the inverse matrix of (5), from which the coefficients for separation are obtained. Using the coefficients the separated hysteresis loops of Co and NiFe layers are calculated from original loops "point by point" as a function of the applied magnetic field.…”
Section: Experimental Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also expect that the Co layers have their polar component close to the saturated value everywhere except for low magnetic fields. Therefore, and represent MO contributions of Co films and the matrix is in the form (5) According to (4), we calculate the inverse matrix of (5), from which the coefficients for separation are obtained. Using the coefficients the separated hysteresis loops of Co and NiFe layers are calculated from original loops "point by point" as a function of the applied magnetic field.…”
Section: Experimental Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of the MO techniques are their high near-surface sensitivity, nondestructive character, and possibility to measure all components of the magnetization vector in the frame of the magneto-optic vector magnetometry [2], [3]. The depth sensitivity of MO effects was systematically studied by Traeger [4] and Hubert [5] using modeling of the MO effect from a buried thin magnetic layer in a nonmagnetic surrounding. Separation of polar MO signal from films in different depths was presented by Ferré [6] and Hamrle et al [7], [8] in the case of Co films separated by Au spacer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second-order effects differ from first-order effects not only in their dependence of the magnetization vector, but also in their optical symmetry behavior [193]. 2.4, are effects to first order in the magneto-optical parameter Q V and in the components m i of the magnetization vector.…”
Section: Voigt Effectmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2.1. Figure 3 shows a model of magneto-optical ultrathin (1 Å thick) Co film buried in non-magneto-optic Co bulk in the deepth t. The similar modeling was originally proposed by Traeger [6] and Hubert [7]. Fig.…”
Section: Basis Of Mo Selectivity To Magnetic Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the magneto-optic Kerr effects enable us to separate magnetic contributions from different depth [6][7][8][9][10] and from different materials [11,12] in multilayer systems and self-organized nanostructures [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%