2001
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/64/12/204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoencephalography - a noninvasive brain imaging method with 1 ms time resolution

Abstract: The basics of magnetoencephalography (MEG), i.e. the measurement and the analysis of the tiny magnetic fields generated outside the scalp by the working human brain, are reviewed. Three main topics are discussed: (1) the relationship between the magnetic field and its generators, including on one hand the neurophysiological basis and the physical theory of magnetic field generation, and on the other hand the techniques for the estimation of the sources from the magnetic field measurements; (2) the instrumental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem does not permit a unique solution. For this reason, it is necessary to acquire supplementary information [Del Gratta et al, 2001], i.e., to define the parameters of the forward problem, to obtain position, intensity, and direction of the modeled cerebral currents (single and multiple dipoles [Scherg and Berg, 1991], music [Mosher et al, 1992], RAP music [Mosher and Leahy, 1999], minimum norm estimates [Hämäläinen and Ilmoniemi, 1994], low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) [Pascual-Marqui et al, 1995], and synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM) [Vrba and Robinson, 2001]. Currently, no universally accepted criteria exist to define adequate model except in very specific cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem does not permit a unique solution. For this reason, it is necessary to acquire supplementary information [Del Gratta et al, 2001], i.e., to define the parameters of the forward problem, to obtain position, intensity, and direction of the modeled cerebral currents (single and multiple dipoles [Scherg and Berg, 1991], music [Mosher et al, 1992], RAP music [Mosher and Leahy, 1999], minimum norm estimates [Hämäläinen and Ilmoniemi, 1994], low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) [Pascual-Marqui et al, 1995], and synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM) [Vrba and Robinson, 2001]. Currently, no universally accepted criteria exist to define adequate model except in very specific cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6). In this regime (q ≪ 1) circle and square loop, give identical results, so that any information about the shape of the magnetometer loop is lost.…”
Section: ) the Gray Dotted Curve Shown On The Left Has Been Obtainementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Se utilizó un modelo simple de dipolo equivalente de corriente (equivalent current dipole ECD) para calcular la localización espacial de las corrientes neuronales que generan la actividad epileptógena 8,9 . La localización de los dipolos fue calculada en referencia a las coordenadas cartesianas definidas por los puntos anatómicos fuduciales (meatos externos auriculares y nasion).…”
Section: Casounclassified