1992
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(92)91086-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetostatic energy and magnetization process in multilayers with perpendicular anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be ascribed to an effective improved texture of the system but also to a stronger signal resulting from the increasing Pt buffer thickness. 17,18 although FWHM values may be influenced by different microstructural parameters. 19 The correlation between the apparent improved structural quality of the system with increasing t Pt and the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy was studied by measuring the anisotropy constant of the bare [Pt/Co] multilayer vs thickness of the buffer layer by EHE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be ascribed to an effective improved texture of the system but also to a stronger signal resulting from the increasing Pt buffer thickness. 17,18 although FWHM values may be influenced by different microstructural parameters. 19 The correlation between the apparent improved structural quality of the system with increasing t Pt and the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy was studied by measuring the anisotropy constant of the bare [Pt/Co] multilayer vs thickness of the buffer layer by EHE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has been done on numerical simulations of the magnetization reversal processes in magneto-optic storage material with perpendicular anisotropy [11][12][13][14]. It has also been shown in Co/Pt multilayers [15] that grain size is a key factor for nucleation and domain formation in thin films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DW energy density per unit area w ð¼ " d =t f Þ is finally determined to be 4:5 AE 0:7 mJ/m 2 , which is typical in Co and Pt based PMA films. 20,21) It is worthwhile to compare our experimental value w with the Bloch wall energy formula w ¼ 4ðAKÞ 1=2 where A is the exchange stiffness. By use of the experimentally determined values w and K, the exchange stiffness A is estimated to be ð1:5 AE 0:5Þ Â 10 À12 J/m, which is about one order smaller than the bulk value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%