Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Hak Untuk Bebas Dari Perlakuan Diskriminasi

Kurnia, Titon Slamet

doi:10.31078/jk1212

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dengan asas tersebut, terdapat tuntutan kepada pembentuk undang-undang maupun penyusun konstitusi untuk menggunakan bahasa yang jelas karena secara prospektif hal ini akan berkorelasi dengan daya kerja dari undang-undang maupun undang-undang dasar (Kurnia, 2014). Sifat jelas tersebut merupakan gradual dari keharusan tertulis.…”

Section: Bindingness Putusan Mkri Berdasarkan Supremacy-of-text Princ...unclassified

“…The Court has nothing to do with the question whether the legislature has committed an absurdity (Bhat & Mir, 2020)." Penafsiran dalam Pasal 24C ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945 pun harus demikian, yakni tegak lurus pada bunyi peraturan, bukan pada ekstentifikasi penafsiran yang keluar dari makna gramatikal apalagi pada intent penyusun Konstitusi sebab: "It's the law that governs, not the intent of the lawgiver … the objective indication of the words, rather than the intent of the legislature, is what constitutes the law (Kurnia, 2014)." Menarik makna yang timbul dari ekstentifikasi diluar batas gramatikal pun harus dicegah untuk menghindari gejala sukarnya pemahaman hukum oleh masyarakat sebagaimana penjelasan Yus Badudu yang dikutip Sirajuddin (2016): "… seolah-olah bahasa hukum itu bahasa dengan corak sendiri, yang tidak sejalan dengan bahasa umum yang digunakan oleh masyarakat.…”

Section: Bindingness Putusan Mkri Berdasarkan Supremacy-of-text Princ...unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mahkamah Konstitusi Setengah-Hati: Final tetapi Tidak Mengikat dalam Kewenangan Pengujian Konstitusional

Kishan,

Rauta,

Alves de Sousa

2024

WIDYUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to discuss the bindingness of constitutional review decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI). In particular, this article looks at the relevance between the grand design of the nature of the MKRI decision in Article 24C paragraph (1) The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) with the practice of constitution disobedience. Based on that issue, this article argues that the MKRI is designed not to have a final and binding decision, but only final decisions. Because based on the Supremacy-of-Text Principle which is coherent with the concept of applying law based on regulations in the Rule of Law, the non-appreance of binding phrases in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 UUD NRI 1945 makes the decision of the Constitutional Court in the authority of constitutional review has no binding legal force. Grammatical argumentation comes frominterpretation with original meaning and textualism methods which find that the word final does not mean binding due the two words stand separately. By drawing on the concepts of strong-form judicial review and weak-form judicial review, the non-binding nature of MKRI decisions can legitimize the disagreement. Because the indecisivenesss of the Constitution establish a halfhearted form of MKRI, namely the partial weak-form judicial review. Thus, the form of MKRI is a strong and weak-form judicial review that makes MKRI decisions can be opposed. This article uses normative research methods with conceptual approach, statutory approach, and comparative approach.

show abstract

Section: Bindingness Putusan Mkri Berdasarkan Supremacy-of-text Princ...unclassified

Mahkamah Konstitusi Setengah-Hati: Final tetapi Tidak Mengikat dalam Kewenangan Pengujian Konstitusional

Kishan,

Rauta,

Alves de Sousa

2024

WIDYUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This research believes that a policy that requires BPJS Health membership in land buying and selling, while on the other hand some people have not registered for BPJS Health membership, has the potential to cause violations of human rights principles. The potential for discrimination and violation of the right to personal freedom of the community in detail can be described as follows: The implementation of the principle of non-discrimination in the system of legislation in Indonesia is realized by the recognition of the provisions on freedom from discriminatory treatment in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945) [11]. Some articles that regulate the prohibition of discrimination in the 1945 Constitution include Article 28D Paragraph (2) which determines that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection, and certainty of a fair law and equal treatment before the law; Article 28I Paragraph (2) regulates the right of everyone to be free from discriminatory actions [12]; Article 27 Paragraph (1) which determines that all citizens are equal before the law and government and must uphold the law and government without exception.…”

Section: Violation Of Human Rights Principles On the Obligation To Pa...mentioning

confidence: 99%

National Health Insurance Participation Obligations in the Implementation of Land Sale and Purchase from a Human Rights Perspective

Sandy,

Ardhanariswari,

Wardaya

et al. 2023

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Presidential Instruction Number 1 Year 2022 on Optimizing the Implementation of the National Health Insurance Program in the Second Dictum Number 17 requires every applicant for registration of transfer of land rights due to sale and purchase to become an active participant in the National Health Insurance (JKN). This is complemented by the issuance of Circular Letter Number 5/SE-400.HK.02/II/2022 concerning Participation in the National Health Insurance (JKN) in the Application for Registration of Transfer of Land Rights or Unit of Ownership of Flat Units Due to Sale and Purchase.Based on BPJS Health data in 2022 there are around 14% of the total population of Indonesia who have not registered for JKN membership and are threatened with not being able to transfer land rights due to sale and purchase. This is the reason for conducting this research to find out the potential violations of the principles of human rights (HAM), especially regarding the right to discrimination and the right to personal freedom and to find out the obstacles that arise due to the implementation of the compulsory JKN membership policy in the implementation of land sale and purchase. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical research with a statutory approach. This study concludes that the obligation of JKN membership in the implementation of land sale and purchase violates the principle of non-discrimination and the right to personal freedom. The policy also causes several obstacles experienced by people who are not JKN participants, including resulting in a longer bureaucratic process in the practice of buying and selling land, limitations on access to BPJS Health membership registration and additional BPJS Health membership registration fees. This research hopes to contribute to policy recommendations that are more in line with human rights principles. These recommendations can contribute to regulatory changes that are more supportive of human rights.

show abstract

Kontroversi Sanksi Denda Pada Vaksinasi Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan

Handayani¹

2021

krtha bhayangkara

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kesehatan merupakan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Negara bertanggung jawab atas penyediaan fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan setiap warga negara Indonesia sebagaimana amanah Pasal 28H angka (1) dan Pasal 34 angka (3) UUD 1945. Pada Pandemic Covid-19, Pemerintah memimplementasikan dengan pengadaan vaksin dan pelaksanaan vaksinasi Covid-19. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah-kaidah atau norma-norma dalam hukum yang positif yang kemudian dihubungkan dengan pembahasan yang menjadi pokok pembahasan. Penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji aturan hukum bersifat formil seperti undang-undang, peraturan serta literatur yang berisi konsep-konsep teoritis. Hasil penelitian mendiskripsikan bahwa Dalam Perpres No. 14 tahun 2021 menyatakan bahwa Setiap orang yang telah ditetapkan sebagai sasaran penerima vaksin Covid- 19 dan tidak mengikuti vaksinasi Covid-19 dapat dikenai sanksi denda. Hal lain adalah penerima vaksin adalah orang sehat yang sesungguhnya tidak melakukan pelanggaran kesehatan sehingga peraturan ini tidak mencerminkan Asas keadilan sebagaimana tertera dalam pasal 2 Undang-Undang No. 36 tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan.

show abstract

Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Hak Untuk Bebas Dari Perlakuan Diskriminasi

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Mahkamah Konstitusi Setengah-Hati: Final tetapi Tidak Mengikat dalam Kewenangan Pengujian Konstitusional

Mahkamah Konstitusi Setengah-Hati: Final tetapi Tidak Mengikat dalam Kewenangan Pengujian Konstitusional

National Health Insurance Participation Obligations in the Implementation of Land Sale and Purchase from a Human Rights Perspective

Kontroversi Sanksi Denda Pada Vaksinasi Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About