Tulisan ini hendak mengkaji pemanfaatan E-Government (Electronic Government) dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia dengan menggunakan perspektif yuridis. berupa pengaturan yang sudah ada pada tingkat nasional atau pusat serta saran tindak bagi daerah dalam rangka mengimplementasikan E-Government, terutama pijakan awalnya berupa suatu kerangka hukum (legal framework). Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan teoretis-konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach).

Judicial interpretation of the right to be free from discrimination is a central issue in the practice of judicial review of the constitutionality of legislation by the MKRI. This article tries to describe and systematize this practice and then to restate the legal principles as it is stated by the MKRI into its case law. This article finds that, as a matter of principle, the MKRI adopts two main tests i.e. strict scrutiny and rational basis test to determine whether a legislation is contrary to the principle    of non-discrimination

There is a strong commitment that constitutional adjudication should be more predictable. As a principle, what has been rightly decided in the past should be the law for the future cases or controvercies. This article makes a substantial critics directed to the constitutional court of decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 on the constitutionality of presidential election rules. This articles argues that the decision shows that predictability is still a serious matter in constitutional adjudication in Indonesia. The author then recommends that to be more predictable the constitutional of court should make a judicial tradition for respecting its past right decisions.

The MKRI is a new governmental body which was established under the Third Amendment of the UUD NRI 1945. This article examines its proper function which underlies its jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legislation. According to the issue, this article argues that the MKRI should be treated as a human rights court whenever it undertakes its jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legislation. The function of the MKRI as a human rights court justifies its existence and also prescribes principles for its operation. It means that in reviewing the constitutionality of legislation the MKRI should enhance the protection of human rights through its judicial policy and constitutional interpretation.Keywords: MKRI, function, human rights court

This study brought up the problems, first, the theoretical foundation of the exchange of regional owned property (BMD) agreements with non-governmental parties that involve assets (land) that are under government control (BMD). Second, juridically, the regulational basis for the exchange agreement serving as the basis for the right to transfer the assets (land) under government control (BMD) can be found in the legislation. In doing such actions, terms and conditions of legislation shall apply as the basis of the validity of the actions which includes the aspects of authority, substance and procedure. Third, another thing that determines the feasibility of government action in exchanging BMD (in the form of land) is the aspect of benefit (doelmatigheid). Keywords: Government contract; exchange; regional property AbstrakPenelitian ini merupakan telaah teoretis dan yuridis terhadap perjanjian tukar menukar barang milik daerah (BMD), terutama tanah, antara pemerintah daerah dengan pihak swasta (non-pemerintah). Permasalahan yang akan dibahas meliputi dasar teoretis, peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta pertimbangan kemanfaatan yang berkaitan dengan tukar menukar BMD. Sebagai penelitian hukum maka pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Berdasarkan hasil telaah ditemukan bahwa kontraktualisasi urusan pemerintahan sudah menjadi praktik lazim, termasuk perjanjian tukar menukar yang melibatkan BMD (tanah) yang berada di bawah penguasaan pemerintah daerah. Perjanjian tersebut dapat ditemukan pengaturannya dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga memberikan sinyal bahwa tindakan tersebut diperbolehkan. Selain kesesuaian dengan peraturan perundang-undangan, perjanjian juga harus mempertimbangkan aspek kemanfaatan (doelmatigheid).