2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.10.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Main properties of Al2O3 thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering of an Al2O3 ceramic target at different radio-frequency power and argon pressure and their passivation effect on p-type c-Si wafers

Abstract: In this work, 50-nm thick Al 2 O 3 thin films were deposited at room temperature by magnetron sputtering from an Al 2 O 3 ceramic target at different RF power and argon pressure values. The sputtering technique could be preferred to conventional atomic layer deposition for an industrial application, owing to its simplicity, availability, and higher deposition rate. The resulting thin films were characterized by UV/Vis/NIR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The deposited Al 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Functionalization of the substrate surface plays a key role in the deposition process as the surface charges of the Al 2 O 3 layer give rise to an electrostatic force for attracting and immobilizing nanospheres. The need for such a layer poses only a minor requirement on substrates for real‐world applications as Al 2 O 3 or an alternative functionalization layer can be deposited by several means, i.e., magnetron‐sputter deposition, solution‐based deposition, or atomic layer deposition (ALD), on many different kind of substrates, in case of atomic layer deposition even on almost arbitrary surface topographies with extreme aspect ratios. The substrates are then immersed into a colloidal dispersion of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) nanospheres with a predefined particle size statistics and ionic strength (see also sketch in Figure a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionalization of the substrate surface plays a key role in the deposition process as the surface charges of the Al 2 O 3 layer give rise to an electrostatic force for attracting and immobilizing nanospheres. The need for such a layer poses only a minor requirement on substrates for real‐world applications as Al 2 O 3 or an alternative functionalization layer can be deposited by several means, i.e., magnetron‐sputter deposition, solution‐based deposition, or atomic layer deposition (ALD), on many different kind of substrates, in case of atomic layer deposition even on almost arbitrary surface topographies with extreme aspect ratios. The substrates are then immersed into a colloidal dispersion of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) nanospheres with a predefined particle size statistics and ionic strength (see also sketch in Figure a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of the chemical composition of the material, the AZO thin films were measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) by using a PHI Multitechnique system (from Physical Electronics) with a monochromatic Xray source from the AlKα line with energy of 1486.8 eV. The measurements were obtained after an erosion treatment with an argon ion sputtering performed in the XPS system, and, due to the difficulty in identifying the Ar 2p 3/2 peak (which must be located at about 241.83 eV, according to the average value of data compiled by Moulder et al for argon implanted in silicon [15]), the binding energies of the recorded spectra were charge-corrected by referencing the center of the whole Ar 2p signal to 242.05 eV, according to our previous observation on argon implanted in sputtering-deposited Al 2 O 3 [16].…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that the glass/Al(OH) 3 -AlOOH samples obtained here by chemical solution deposition are less transparent that our previously reported Al 2 O 3 thin films obtained by radio-frequency sputtering. [24] An explanation for this is the difference in the composition of the chemically deposited samples (the Al 2 O 3 phase may be present in a very low proportion), as well as a difference in the surface roughness. Regarding the latter, the opaque appearance of the glass/ Al(OH) 3 -AlOOH samples, as can be seen in Figure 2, is characteristic of rough surfaces, since such roughness leads to an observable scattering of the light (such scattered light is not detected by the spectrophotometer during the measuring since it is dispersed to other directions when it reaches or leaves the Al(OH) 3 -AlOOH thin film; this is a diffuse transmittance, and it is not measured with the spectrophotometer that we used).…”
Section: Characterization By Ultraviolet-visible Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%