2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00232-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major agricultural changes required to mitigate phosphorus losses under climate change

Abstract: Phosphorus losses from land to water will be impacted by climate change and land management for food production, with detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Here we use a unique combination of methods to evaluate the impact of projected climate change on future phosphorus transfers, and to assess what scale of agricultural change would be needed to mitigate these transfers. We combine novel high-frequency phosphorus flux data from three representative catchments across the UK, a new high-spatial resolution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
109
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A growing body of evidence shows that the efforts in combating eutrophication in North America and Europe (Bol et al, 2018; Jarvie et al, 2013), and specifically of the Baltic Sea (Conley et al, 2009; European Court of Auditors, 2016), are unsatisfactory. A greater use of mitigation measures is thus required to achieve good chemical and ecological status, particularly in light of climate change (Ockenden et al, 2017). However, many studies show mixed effectiveness of these measures on water quality and considerable lags between treatment and response (Dodd and Sharpley, 2015; Meals et al, 2010) that are increasingly difficult to communicate to stakeholders expecting instant improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A growing body of evidence shows that the efforts in combating eutrophication in North America and Europe (Bol et al, 2018; Jarvie et al, 2013), and specifically of the Baltic Sea (Conley et al, 2009; European Court of Auditors, 2016), are unsatisfactory. A greater use of mitigation measures is thus required to achieve good chemical and ecological status, particularly in light of climate change (Ockenden et al, 2017). However, many studies show mixed effectiveness of these measures on water quality and considerable lags between treatment and response (Dodd and Sharpley, 2015; Meals et al, 2010) that are increasingly difficult to communicate to stakeholders expecting instant improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitigation measures are often built in headwater catchments, which control the water quality signature of the stream network (Abbott et al, 2018; Alexander et al, 2007) and are hot spots of agricultural water pollution (Bieroza et al, 2018). Recent studies indicate that extreme weather can exacerbate nutrient and sediment export from agricultural headwater catchments (Mellander et al, 2018), requiring large‐scale mitigation solutions to offset the increased hydrologic flashiness of the changing climate (Ockenden et al, 2017). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both agronomic and environmental P management decisions are highly site specific, which makes them variably cost effective and, in the case of environmental decisions, liable to failure, such as during extreme rainfall events (Howden et al, 2007; Nelson et al, 2009; Ockenden et al, 2017). For this reason, Mellander et al (2018) recommends the development of integrated climate–chemical watershed response indicators for water quality objectives.…”
Section: Our Directions For the Future Development Of Decision Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous-time and discrete-time model structures are described below (from Ockenden et al, 2017). The parameter estimates in both continuous-time models and discrete-time models are formulaically related (Table S3).…”
Section: Transfer Function Model Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%