2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11721-011-0062-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: a mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making

Abstract: Collective decision-making is a process whereby the members of a group decide on a course of action by consensus. In this paper, we propose a collective decision-making mechanism for robot swarms deployed in scenarios in which robots can choose between two actions that have the same effects but that have different execution times. The proposed mechanism allows a swarm composed of robots with no explicit knowledge about the difference in execution times between the two actions to choose the one with the shorter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case study consists of a swarm of robots that have to collectively identify the shortest path between two possible choices. We validate our results against those presented in [21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The case study consists of a swarm of robots that have to collectively identify the shortest path between two possible choices. We validate our results against those presented in [21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this paper, we analyse a collective decision-making system originally proposed by Montes de Oca et al [21]. The task of the robots is to transport objects from a start area to a goal area.…”
Section: Collective Decision-making: a Bio-pepa Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of this, it is not possible to use it for precisely predicting or optimising swarm performance, or to study macroscopic robot population dynamics, as can be done by using probabilistic finite state machines and differential equations (e.g. Liu and Winfield 2010;Montes de Oca et al 2011;Mather and Hsieh 2012;Reina et al 2015b;Scheidler et al 2016;Valentini et al 2016). Similarly, it is not possible to use the framework to uncover behaviour rules of agents, as can be done by using Turing Learning (Li et al 2016).…”
Section: The Icr Framework and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Winfield 2010;Reina et al 2015a) and differential equations (DEs) (e.g. Montes de Oca et al 2011;Mather and Hsieh 2012;Reina et al 2015b;Scheidler et al 2016;Valentini et al 2016). A comprehensive overview of these methods can be found in Brambilla et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%