1979
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1979.326560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammogram Inspection by Computer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O k (ρ, ϕ) = a 1 (B 10 cos ϕ k + B 11 sin ϕ k ) + a 3 (B 30 cos 3ϕ k + B 31 sin 3ϕ k ) (25) which in terms of filter responses gives: …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O k (ρ, ϕ) = a 1 (B 10 cos ϕ k + B 11 sin ϕ k ) + a 3 (B 30 cos 3ϕ k + B 31 sin 3ϕ k ) (25) which in terms of filter responses gives: …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wee et al [1], in 1975, developed a procedure to evaluate calcifications on mammograms based on a set of features. Spiesberger [2] proposed a similar procedure, in which features were applied in a decision tree for calcification detection. During the period of 1987 to 1990, Chan et al [3] reported on a series of detection systems based on a difference-image technique.…”
Section: Inrroducnonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early 1979, Spiesberger and Wolfgang showed the reliability and feasibility to inspect mammograms by computer [4]. They used brightness measures, gray-level statistics, and a compactness measure in detection algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%