Nature of the problemBiodiversity is the variability among living organisms, from genes to the biosphere. Th e value of biodiversity is multifold, from preserving • the integrity of the biosphere as a whole, to providing food and medicines, to spiritual and aesthetic well-being. One of the major drivers of biodiversity loss in Europe is atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen (N • r ).
ApproachesTh is chapter focuses on N • r impacts on European plant species diversity; in particular, the number and abundance of diff erent species in a given area, and the presence of characteristic species of sensitive ecosystems. We summarise both the scientifi c and the policy aspects of N • r impacts on diversity and identify, using a range of evidence, the most vulnerable ecosystems and regions in Europe.
Key fi ndings / state of knowledgeReactive nitrogen impacts vegetation diversity through direct foliar damage, eutrophication, acidifi cation, and susceptibility to secondary • stress. Species and communities most sensitive to chronically elevated N • r deposition are those that are adapted to low nutrient levels, or are poorly buff ered against acidifi cation. Grassland, heathland, peatland, forest, and arctic/montane ecosystems are recognised as vulnerable habitats in Europe; other habitats may be vulnerable but are still poorly studied. It is not yet clear if diff erent wet-deposited forms of N • r (e.g. nitrate, NO 3 − versus ammonium, NH 4 + ) have diff erent eff ects on biodiversity. However, gaseous ammonia (NH 3 ) can be particularly harmful to vegetation, especially lower plants, through direct foliar damage. Th ere are some clear examples of reductions in faunal diversity that can be linked to N • r deposition, but overall, our knowledge of faunal eff ects is still limited. Changes to above-ground faunal communities probably occur primarily through changes in vegetation diversity, composition or structure. Evidence is strong that ecological communities respond to the accumulated pool of plant-available N in the soil. Th us the • cumulative load of enhanced N r impacting an ecosystem is probably highly important. Because of this response to cumulative inputs, it is likely that biodiversity has been in decline in Europe for many decades due to enhanced • N r deposition. Equally, full recovery in response to reduced N r deposition is likely to be slow, especially in highly impacted ecosystems. In some cases recovery may require management intervention. Exceedence of critical loads for nutrient nitrogen is linked to reduced plant species richness in a broad range of European ecosystems. •
Major uncertainties/challengesIt is very likely that N • r deposition acts synergistically with other stressors, in particular climate change, acid deposition, and ground-level ozone; these synergies are poorly understood. Th e nature and rate of recovery of biodiversity from nitrogen pollution is not well understood. Th e optimal strategy to restore a habitat, • and exactly what this 'restored' habitat constitutes, are both hard ...