2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-012-0740-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and candidate gene identification of loci determining tolerance to greenbug (Schizaphis graminum, Rondani) in barley

Abstract: Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be selfarchived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author's version for posting to your own website or your institution's repository. You may further deposit the accepted author's version on a funder's repository at a funder's request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ISSR marker for resistance QTL1 on chromosome 2H was less precise in the Barke than in the Lina genetic background when validated in BC 2 F 1 DH lines, probably due to it being located less distally, at 13.1 cM (Cheung et al 2010 ), than the SNP markers from the present study at 0–6 cM. Barley chromosomes 2H and 3H may harbor QTL for resistance to RWA and GB as well, but their locations differ from those conferring resistance to R. padi (Nieto-Lopez and Blake 1994 ; Mittal et al 2008 ; Cheung et al 2010 ; Tocho et al 2012 , 2013 ; Azhaguvel et al 2014 ; Dahleen et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The ISSR marker for resistance QTL1 on chromosome 2H was less precise in the Barke than in the Lina genetic background when validated in BC 2 F 1 DH lines, probably due to it being located less distally, at 13.1 cM (Cheung et al 2010 ), than the SNP markers from the present study at 0–6 cM. Barley chromosomes 2H and 3H may harbor QTL for resistance to RWA and GB as well, but their locations differ from those conferring resistance to R. padi (Nieto-Lopez and Blake 1994 ; Mittal et al 2008 ; Cheung et al 2010 ; Tocho et al 2012 , 2013 ; Azhaguvel et al 2014 ; Dahleen et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…As we used a different, qualitative method, it is likely that the greenbug resistance in Post 90*4/R015 from the present study and the Oregon Wolfe Barley from Tocho et al. () is controlled by different mechanisms. It is also likely that the virulence of the greenbugs used in the two studies was different, which is common among natural greenbug populations (Weng et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Tocho et al. () found that greenbug tolerance in ‘Oregon Wolfe Barley’ was controlled by three quantitative trait loci (QTL) that were located in chromosome 2H (for foliage area and dry weight), 5H (for final dry weight) and 7H (for chlorophyll content). As we used a different, qualitative method, it is likely that the greenbug resistance in Post 90*4/R015 from the present study and the Oregon Wolfe Barley from Tocho et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QTL analyses and genome-wide association mapping of RWA resistance in barley have revealed several responsible loci; among them loci on chromosome 2H and 3H (Nieto-Lopez and Blake 1994;Mittal et al 2008Mittal et al , 2009Tocho et al 2012Tocho et al , 2013Dahleen et al 2015). The RWA resistance loci on 2H is at 27 and 39 cM (Mittal et al 2008;Mittal et al 2009, respectively), 18 and 20 cM (Dahleen et al 2015), 70-96 cM (Tocho et al 2012) and at 70-96 cM for GB resistance as well (Tocho et al 2013) and thus not at the same locus as the present QTL for R. padi resistance. The RWA resistance locus on 3H is at around 147 and 108 cM (Mittal et al 2008(Mittal et al , 2009 and 136 cM (Dahleen et al 2015), potentially within the region of the gramine QTL in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%