2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the potential mycorrhizal associations of the conterminous United States of America

Abstract: a b s t r a c tMycorrhizal associations are recognized as key symbioses in a changing world, yet our understanding of their geographic distribution and temporal dynamics remains limited. We combined data on mycorrhizal associations and historical dominant vegetation to map the pre-European Settlement mycorrhizal associations of the conterminous United States of America (USA). As a demonstration of the map's utility, we estimated changes in mycorrhizal associations due to urbanization, agriculture and the estab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If we were able to conduct the same analyses at a more precise spatial scale that could incorporate vegetation data into the models, we expect that, in line with earlier studies, we would find a significant relationship between the fungal and environmental gradients, as identified with respect to fungal composition gradients, with vegetation type (e.g. Bueno et al., ; Soudzilovskaia et al., ; Swaty et al., ; Tedersoo et al., ). A clear next challenge is to connect the fungal–environment relationships to the fungal–vegetation relationships, ideally while simultaneously separating direct and indirect effects from each other.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we were able to conduct the same analyses at a more precise spatial scale that could incorporate vegetation data into the models, we expect that, in line with earlier studies, we would find a significant relationship between the fungal and environmental gradients, as identified with respect to fungal composition gradients, with vegetation type (e.g. Bueno et al., ; Soudzilovskaia et al., ; Swaty et al., ; Tedersoo et al., ). A clear next challenge is to connect the fungal–environment relationships to the fungal–vegetation relationships, ideally while simultaneously separating direct and indirect effects from each other.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…). Much research has focused on this connection, to the point of extrapolating biotic trends as a means to describe matching, unsurveyed fungal patterns (Bueno et al., ; Soudzilovskaia et al., ; Swaty, Michael, Deckert, & Gehring, ). Saprotrophic fungi, also, are often considered in terms of their substrates, and their distribution often reflects the availability and quality of specific substrates, for example, wood types and leaf litter (Bässler, Müller, Dziock, & Brandl, ; Heilmann‐Clausen, Aude, et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). These comparisons reveal that most plant communities are dominated by mycorrhizal plants in most ecosystems, EcM plants are rare or absent in many tropical habitats, whereas NM plants are more common and diverse in some arid and degraded habitats, as well as arctic and alpine regions (Brundrett, ; Gerz et al ., ; Swaty et al ., ; Soudzilovskaia et al ., ). In particular, plants with NM cluster roots have centres of diversity in extremely poor soils in Mediterranean habitats of Western Australia and South Africa (Lambers et al ., ).…”
Section: Mycorrhizal Plant Diversity At Global and Local Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and geographical linkages of fungal nutritional modes with vegetation groups (Swaty et al. , Bueno et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%