Marital Status and Overall Survival in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of an Ancillary Analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 9704

Abstract

Background Several registry‐based analyses suggested a survival advantage for married versus single patients with pancreatic cancer. The mechanisms underlying the association of marital status and survival are likely multiple and complex and, therefore, may be obscured in analyses generated from large population‐based databases. The goal of this research was to characterize this potential association of marital status with outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who underwent combined modality adjuvant therapy on a prospective clinical trial. Materials and Methods This is an ancillary analysis of 367 patients with known marital status treated on NRG Oncology/RTOG 97‐04. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results Of 367 patients, 271 (74%) were married or partnered and 96 (26%) were single. Married or partnered patients were more likely to be male. There was no association between marital status and overall survival (OS) or disease‐free survival (DFS) on univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 and 1.01, respectively) or multivariate analyses (HR, 1.05 and 0.98, respectively). Married or partnered male patients did not have improved survival compared with female or single patients. Conclusion Ancillary analysis of data from NRG Oncology/RTOG 97‐04 demonstrated no association between marital and/or partner status and OS or DFS in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy followed by concurrent external beam radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Clinical trial identification number. NCT00003216. Implications for Practice Several population‐based studies have shown an epidemiological link between marital status and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. A better understanding of this association could offer an opportunity to improve outcomes through psychosocial interventions designed to mitigate the negative effects of not being married. Based on the results of this analysis, patients who have undergone a resection and are receiving adjuvant therapy on a clinical trial are unlikely to benefit from such interventions. Further efforts to study the association between marital status and survival should be focused on less selected subgroups of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic Nomograms for Nonelderly Adults with Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

“…In recent years, the psychological intervention has gradually received attention in cancer treatment. Similar to our research results, many literatures pointed out that marital status was a socioeconomic factor that affects prognosis of cancer patients [ 23 – 26 ]. This may be married people get more humanistic care and emotional support to achieve better survival outcomes [ 27 ].…”

[Retracted] Epidemiological Analysis and Prognosis of Conjunctival Cancer in the Past Twenty Years: A Population‐Based Retrospective Study Using SEER Data

“…Our study is the first to demonstrate that being single, divorced, or widowed is a risk factor associated with primary site-labeled conjunctival and corneal cancer incidence. Prior studies have primarily only examined the relationship between marital status and other forms of cancer including colorectal cancer [ 22 ], neuroendocrine tumors [ 23 ], and gastric adenocarcinoma [ 24 ] in retrospective [ 25 ] analyses or in prospective analyses [ 26 ]. While several studies have assessed the relationship between marital status and patient prognosis, conclusions have varied significantly among studies.…”

Survival outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy versus extended pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure for pancreatic head carcinoma: a propensity score matching study

“…However, to our surprise, the single or divorced patients may have a poorer OS than those of being married. The reasons for that may include the lonely, anxious and depressed life, lack of enough care and high occurrence rate of accidents ( 28 , 29 ).…”