2012
DOI: 10.3166/ejc.18.323-330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Actuator Assignment for Networked Control Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it can be deduced from Theorem 1 that the FDF (6) with parameters given by (36) guarantees the fault detection dynamics (7) with partially known transition probabilities is stochastically stable and achieves the prescribed H ∞ attenuation level (10). And the proof is finished.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Consequently, it can be deduced from Theorem 1 that the FDF (6) with parameters given by (36) guarantees the fault detection dynamics (7) with partially known transition probabilities is stochastically stable and achieves the prescribed H ∞ attenuation level (10). And the proof is finished.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Then, we can easily know that the system is stochastically stable according to Theorem 1 in Guo and Lu [15]. Thus the proof is completed.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Theorem 2. Given the system (10), if there exists stabilizing solution for the CARE (35), the optimal control law that minimizes the cost function (33) is given bȳ…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%