2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials characterization by instrumented indentation using two different approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(15). Let us also compare the results with the data of the finite element analysis [19]. 2 2 2 3 2 43 , 3 05 , 34 , 0 45 , 9993 16 , 437 1 81 , 1 34 , 8 70 .…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Data and Published Data Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15). Let us also compare the results with the data of the finite element analysis [19]. 2 2 2 3 2 43 , 3 05 , 34 , 0 45 , 9993 16 , 437 1 81 , 1 34 , 8 70 .…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Data and Published Data Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that the indentation test can provide an accurate prediction of the mechanical behavior of homogenous materials [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. This test does not directly provide the stress-strain curve σ(ε) of the tested sample but an indentation load-depth curve F(h) from which the parameters of the material's hardening law can be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimization process is controlled by optimization/minimization methods and algorithms such as Levenberg-Marquardt, Simplex, SiDoLo or Kalman [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The algorithms minimize an objective-function, which describes the error between the two curves (e.g.…”
Section: Inverse Algorithm and Fe-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%