2017
DOI: 10.13189/ujar.2017.050201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Phylogenetics of Some Anatolian Cattle Breeds

Abstract: In the current study, the mtDNA D-Loop region was analyzed in South Anatolian Red (SAR, n=51), Anatolian Black (NB, n=50), Anatolian Grey (AG, n=54), Native Southern Anatolian Yellow (NSAY, n=51), East Anatolian Red (EAR, n=54) and Zavot (ZAV, n=19) cattle breeds (n=279) to reveal diversity of mitochondrial DNA, differentiation of breeds, and relevance between genetic differentiations and geographic distributions. Blood samples were collected from native cattle breeds. Genomic DNA was isolated using a standard… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of private alleles in SAR and NSY may be an indicator of gene flow between them. Similar clustering was observed in studies carried out by mtDNA (Özdemir & Doğru, 2017;Doğan et al, 2017) and autosomal microsatellite markers (Özşensoy et al, 2010) analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of private alleles in SAR and NSY may be an indicator of gene flow between them. Similar clustering was observed in studies carried out by mtDNA (Özdemir & Doğru, 2017;Doğan et al, 2017) and autosomal microsatellite markers (Özşensoy et al, 2010) analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Fifteen cattle breeds raised in Anatolia were declared extinct (FAO, 2018) Studies have been carried out to investigate genetic variation and genetic relationships among Turkish native cattle breeds by unipaternal markers and autosomal genetic markers. Moreover, these breeds were investigated by Y chromosomal markers (Özşensoy et al, 2014), mtDNA (Özdemir & Doğru, 2009;Doğan et al, 2017), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Güneren et al, 2010) and microsatellite (Özkan, 2005; Özşensoy et al, 2010) markers. In this study, the authors aimed to estimate the genetic diversity of five Turkish native breeds by autosomal microsatellite markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, genetic diversity is expected to decline as the distance from the domestication centres increases, mainly because a small percentage of the gene pool is distributed to other regions by human-mediated migration. High genetic diversity was also reported by Dogan et al (2017), who revealed mtDNA diversity in all native Turkish cattle breeds (n = 279) via the D-loop region. Nucleotide diversity was reported to range from 0.013 (TGS) to 0.018 (EAR), as well as haplotype diversity varying between 0.983 (TGS) and 0.998 (SAY).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Haplogroup Classification In Native Tu...supporting
confidence: 62%
“…This finding confirms the genetic origin of native Turkish cattle breeds which originated from Bos taurus. Phylogenetic re-lationships between native Turkish and other cattle breeds were also assessed by Özdemir and Dogru (2009) and Dogan et al (2017). Native Turkish cattle breeds were reported to be clearly distinct from cattle breeds raised in India, Africa and Japan, while they were located close to European cattle breeds such as HF, SIM, BS and HER (Özdemir and Dogru, 2009).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships and Indicine Admixture In Native ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical and important role of Bali cattle and SO cattle towards the existence of current breeds in Indonesia evidenced their high adaptability to tropical condition. However, the genetic information of Bali cattle (Bos javanicus) has remained deficient in comparison with that of other breeds such as Bos taurus and Bos inducus (Sharma et al, 2015;Doğan et al, 2017). Regarding studies on genetic diversity and phylogenetic, mitochondrial DNA genome could be the best approach (Rehman et al, 2017) compared to markers from the nuclear genome (Van Marle-Köster and Nel, 2003;Viryanski, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%