2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-460x(03)00377-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum likelihood identification of non-stationary operational data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in such structures, ambient excitation sourcesfor instance from wind -are always present in addition to the controlled input forces, thereby compromising the input-output relationship (Parloo et al, 2003).…”
Section: Forced Vibration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in such structures, ambient excitation sourcesfor instance from wind -are always present in addition to the controlled input forces, thereby compromising the input-output relationship (Parloo et al, 2003).…”
Section: Forced Vibration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the acquisition is done using the SLDV, an accelerometer was mounted on the ceiling as a reference. This reference measurement is necessary for the OMA approach to obtain useful phase information and to cope with the non-stationarity of the ambient excitation (see [16]). …”
Section: Note That a Large 2 Kn Shaker Could Be Used To Apply Arbitramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the estimated mode shape vectors remain unscaled (i.e. dependent on the unknown level of ambient excitation) [15]. The relationship between the unscaled mode shape vector c f g i (as obtained by in-operation modal analysis) and the corresponding correctly scaled mode shape vector f f g i (as can be obtained from a classical forced-vibration test) of mode i can, therefore, be expressed by…”
Section: Sensitivity-based Rescaling Of Operational Mode Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be stated that, for a given mode, the shift in natural frequency should be at least 10 times larger than the uncertainty (99.8% confidence interval) estimated for that shift. All these uncertainties can be directly obtained by making use of an ML estimator [1,15,17]. For some specific applications, the application of the sensitivity-based normalisation technique may not always be straightforward.…”
Section: Sensitivity-based Rescaling Of Operational Mode Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation