2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01066.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of CFA-Induced Hyperalgesia and Morphine-Induced Analgesia in Rats: Dorsal vs Plantar Mechanical Stimulation of the Hindpaw

Abstract: Reliable and sensitive assessment of animal pain behaviors is critical to translational pain research. This study demonstrates the importance of using proper test protocols in animal studies and its implication in preclinical screening of potential analgesics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
12
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our primary observation of distinct differences in neuropathic versus inflammatory pathophysiology between sub‐strains, is a report of strain‐related differences in sensitivity to spared nerve injury, linked to spinal cord and midbrain serotonin levels, which were largely absent in CFA‐inflamed mice (Wijnvoord et al., ). Our CFA‐induced hyperalgesia was reversed dose‐dependently by morphine in all SD sub‐strains, in general agreement with other studies (Wang et al., ; Soignier et al., ). In contrast to our CCI results, we found a subtle difference in morphine‐induced anti‐nociception between sub‐strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with our primary observation of distinct differences in neuropathic versus inflammatory pathophysiology between sub‐strains, is a report of strain‐related differences in sensitivity to spared nerve injury, linked to spinal cord and midbrain serotonin levels, which were largely absent in CFA‐inflamed mice (Wijnvoord et al., ). Our CFA‐induced hyperalgesia was reversed dose‐dependently by morphine in all SD sub‐strains, in general agreement with other studies (Wang et al., ; Soignier et al., ). In contrast to our CCI results, we found a subtle difference in morphine‐induced anti‐nociception between sub‐strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, we were surprised that Crl:SD rats were paradoxically least sensitive to Randall Selitto stimulation of the hindpaw (Crl:SD<Hsd:SD<LEW<WKY=F344). Thereafter, following CFA‐injection, with the threshold difference considered as an index of mechanical hyperalgesia (Kristensen et al., ; Soignier et al., ), we observed similar responses in all strains, with the exception of WKY which developed only a modest hyperalgesia. These findings were unexpected based on (a) reports that F344 rats develop more robust hyperalgesia than LEW rats in response to acute inflammation induced by CFA (Zhang, Lao, Qiao, & Ruda, ), carrageenan (Fecho, Manning, Maixner, & Schmitt, ; Fecho & Valtschanoff, ; Juif, Anton, & Hanesch, ) or formalin (Lariviere, Sattar, & Melzack, ) (b) increased expression of formalin‐induced second phase nocifensive behaviours in WKY versus SD rats (Burke et al., ) (c) the comparable level of CFA‐induced oedema in WKY and the other strains in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These anti‐hyperalgesic effects were not due to general behavioural inhibition because within the dose ranges studied, all three drugs do not alter the general locomotor activity (Thorn et al ., ). Similarly, morphine also dose‐dependently attenuated the mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia (Figure ), consistent with the literature (Nagakura et al ., ; Soignier et al ., ). Von Frey filament stimulation does not induce physiological nociception in rats, although a reflexive paw withdrawal can usually be provoked when a large enough pressure is applied to the paw.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%