“…The obtained total cross-section (TOX) above the minimum measurable energy of 800 keV, which is also derived by integrating ADX over angle, is fairly larger than that of JENDL-3.3 as described in Table 1. Unexpectedly, the result shows an opposite trend to the suggestion pointed out by the previous benchmark studies [1,2].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparison With Nuclear Datacontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the opposite results are actually seen in Table 1 and pointed out by Ref. [2]. It means the nuclear temperature of 0.65 MeV is a little small.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 67%
“…In JENDL-3.3, the nuclear temperature of 0.65 MeV is employed for the evaluation. Ichihara et al [2] pointed out if the nat Zr(n,2n) reaction cross-section of JENDL-3.2 is reduced by 10% and the secondary neutron spectrum below 1 MeV is reduced by 20%, the agreement between the measured and calculated neutron spectra would be improved. This means the nuclear temperature should be a little higher.…”
Section: Analysis With Nuclear Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nat Zr(n,2n) reaction cross-section is one of such important reactions, because Li 2 ZrO 3 is one of the fusion blanket candidate materials. However, in the previous benchmark studies it was pointed out that agreement of leakage neutron spectrum between experiment and evaluation was not acceptable [1,2]. According to Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Refs. [1,2], the disagreement may be caused by a problem that the absolute value of the (n,2n) reaction cross-section does not agree between the experiment and evaluation. Also, from a result obtained by Maekawa [3], a similar trend to Ref.…”
“…The obtained total cross-section (TOX) above the minimum measurable energy of 800 keV, which is also derived by integrating ADX over angle, is fairly larger than that of JENDL-3.3 as described in Table 1. Unexpectedly, the result shows an opposite trend to the suggestion pointed out by the previous benchmark studies [1,2].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparison With Nuclear Datacontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the opposite results are actually seen in Table 1 and pointed out by Ref. [2]. It means the nuclear temperature of 0.65 MeV is a little small.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 67%
“…In JENDL-3.3, the nuclear temperature of 0.65 MeV is employed for the evaluation. Ichihara et al [2] pointed out if the nat Zr(n,2n) reaction cross-section of JENDL-3.2 is reduced by 10% and the secondary neutron spectrum below 1 MeV is reduced by 20%, the agreement between the measured and calculated neutron spectra would be improved. This means the nuclear temperature should be a little higher.…”
Section: Analysis With Nuclear Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nat Zr(n,2n) reaction cross-section is one of such important reactions, because Li 2 ZrO 3 is one of the fusion blanket candidate materials. However, in the previous benchmark studies it was pointed out that agreement of leakage neutron spectrum between experiment and evaluation was not acceptable [1,2]. According to Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Refs. [1,2], the disagreement may be caused by a problem that the absolute value of the (n,2n) reaction cross-section does not agree between the experiment and evaluation. Also, from a result obtained by Maekawa [3], a similar trend to Ref.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.