1996
DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
867
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,286 publications
(877 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
867
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Camanho et al [24] have shown that the expression proposed by Benzeggagh and Kenane [36] for the critical energy release rate for a mixedmode ratio is more accurate for epoxy and PEEK composites. The expression proposed by Benzeggagh and Kenane for the critical energy release rate G c is:…”
Section: Propagation Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Camanho et al [24] have shown that the expression proposed by Benzeggagh and Kenane [36] for the critical energy release rate for a mixedmode ratio is more accurate for epoxy and PEEK composites. The expression proposed by Benzeggagh and Kenane for the critical energy release rate G c is:…”
Section: Propagation Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delamination onset criterion stems from the expression of the critical energy release rate for delamination propagation under mixed-mode loading proposed by Benzeggagh and Kenane [36]. The model is implemented in the implicit finite element code ABAQUS [54] by means of a user-written decohesion element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure initiation was governed by a quadratic stress criterion, (1) where τ i (i = 1,2,3) are the stresses in the in-plane directions (1,2) and normal direction (3) respectively, and are the corresponding maximum stresses associated with each direction, . Delamination was propagated using a mixed-mode relationship proposed by Benzeggagh and Kenane (B-K propagation criterion) [11], (2) where G c is the mixed-mode fracture toughness, B is the local mixed-mode ratio defined as B = G shear /(G I + G shear ). As mode III is not considered, G shear = G II .…”
Section: Interlaminar Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) (12) (13) where γ ij is the current shear strain, is the final failure shear strain, and is the inelastic strain at the onset of fracture. In order to account for irreversibility, the damage variable, as a function of analysis time, t, is defined as (14) As damage is triggered when the shear strength, , is reached, the response follows a negative tangent stiffness resulting in the softening of the secant shear modulus, with increasing applied strain, to (1 -d mat ) , shown by path 3 in Figure 4.…”
Section: Damage Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With 3D elements, the adhesive layer can be defined as isotropic material. The problem can then be solved in the elastic strain range using Hooke's law and cohesive surface contact [5], or with the aid of 3D cohesive elements [6,7]. These elements can be related to Griffith's theory of fracture [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%