2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, macular thickness, and foveal volume in amblyopic eyes using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al31 reported that the central macular thickness values in the 1 mm and 3 mm regions were not significantly different in amblyopic and normal fellow eyes, although the mean macular foveolar thickness was significantly thicker in the amblyopic eyes than in the fellow eyes. We did not examine the foveolar thickness in this study; however, there were no differences in the macular full retinal thickness in the 1 mm region, similar to that observed in most previous studies 28,29,3134. However, the macular full retinal thickness in the 3 mm region was significantly thicker in the amblyopic eyes than in the fellow eyes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wu et al31 reported that the central macular thickness values in the 1 mm and 3 mm regions were not significantly different in amblyopic and normal fellow eyes, although the mean macular foveolar thickness was significantly thicker in the amblyopic eyes than in the fellow eyes. We did not examine the foveolar thickness in this study; however, there were no differences in the macular full retinal thickness in the 1 mm region, similar to that observed in most previous studies 28,29,3134. However, the macular full retinal thickness in the 3 mm region was significantly thicker in the amblyopic eyes than in the fellow eyes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, Wu et al31 reported that anisometropic amblyopes had thicker cpRNFL values in the amblyopic eye than in the fellow eye based on SD-OCT. Our present data is in agreement with these results. In contrast, some studies that have investigated the cpRNFL thickness in amblyopic eyes using SD-OCT found no significant differences compared to that observed in controls 27,29,32. Regarding this contradiction, Kim et al34 pointed out that the majority of these studies did not correct the ocular magnification errors related to refraction and axial length, whereas most previous studies included patients with anisometropia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alotaibi and Dickmann suggested based on their findings that amblyopia of different etiologies is associated with the loss of different neural cells [20], [23], [24]. Later, in 2012, Dickmann evaluated 15 strabismic (esotropic) and 15 anisometropic amblyopic patients, and found no intereye differences in cpRNFL, macular thickness and foveal volume in neither group using spectral-domain (SD) OCT [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Dickmann ve ark. 9 anizometropik ambliyopisi ve şaşılık ambliyopisi olan iki ayrı grupta yaptıkları çalışmada, sağlam ve ambliyop gözlerin maküla ve RSLT kalınlıkları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark olmadığını bildirmişlerdir. Bizim çalışmamıza tek taraflı anizometropik ambliyop olgular dahil edilerek, olguların sadece maküla kalınlıkları iki farklı ölçüm modu ile değerlendirildi.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified