2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.102.151101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of theFe60(n,γ)61FeCross Section at Stellar Temperatures

Abstract: Observations of galactic gamma-ray activity have challenged the current understanding of nucleosynthesis in massive stars. Recent measurements of (60)Fe abundances relative to ;{26}Al;{g} have underscored the need for accurate nuclear information concerning the stellar production of (60)Fe. In light of this motivation, a first measurement of the stellar (60)Fe(n, gamma)(61)Fe cross section, the predominant destruction mechanism of (60)Fe, has been performed by activation at the Karlsruhe Van de Graaff accelera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…II.A.4). Illustrative examples in this respect are the successful measurements of the MACS of 60 Fe (Uberseder et al, 2009) and 147 Pm . In the first case, the sample (Schumann et al, 2010) consisted of 1.4 × 10 16 atoms or 1.4 µg and the activation was complicated by the 6 min half life of the 61 Fe, which required 47 repeated irradiations, and by the small capture cross section of 5.7 mb.…”
Section: Activationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…II.A.4). Illustrative examples in this respect are the successful measurements of the MACS of 60 Fe (Uberseder et al, 2009) and 147 Pm . In the first case, the sample (Schumann et al, 2010) consisted of 1.4 × 10 16 atoms or 1.4 µg and the activation was complicated by the 6 min half life of the 61 Fe, which required 47 repeated irradiations, and by the small capture cross section of 5.7 mb.…”
Section: Activationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, the sample (Schumann et al, 2010) consisted of 1.4 × 10 16 atoms or 1.4 µg and the activation was complicated by the 6 min half life of the 61 Fe, which required 47 repeated irradiations, and by the small capture cross section of 5.7 mb. Note that the number of atoms and the cross section result reduced by a factor 1.75 compared to the original paper (Uberseder et al, 2009) because of a new precise half-life determination for 60 Fe (Rugel et al, 2009). The second experiment was performed with an even smaller sample of only 28 ng or 1.1 × 10 14 atoms in order to keep the 147 Pm activity (t 1/2 = 2.6 yr) at a reasonable value.…”
Section: Activationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material was extracted from the beam stop and iron was chemically separated. The material of this present work was originally used as a target in a cross section measurement of 60 Fe(n,γ) 61 Fe at stellar energies [15]. The 60 Fe from the target was later recovered and 60 Co was chemically removed.…”
Section: Sample Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data are from Refs. [4,[27][28][29][30][31][32]. Macklin et al [29] measured the capture cross sections of 56,57 Fe from 11 to 60 keV.…”
Section: B the Neutron Capture Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the weak region in massive stars, this process is termed as weak sr-process [3]. For example, a significant amount of 60 Fe can be produced during the high neutron flux in shell carbon burning phase of s-process [4]. This is the result of branching at 59 Fe with the half-life of 44.495 days.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%