Throughout various fields of scientific investigation, including neonatology and trauma medicine, the idea of the golden hour of treatment has long been debated (1-3). Defined as an interval most critical for successful emergency treatment and improved patient outcomes, the golden hour(s) is contingent on the delivery of early and frequently, protocol-driven care. Although advances in medicine have improved outcomes in these fields, the concept of the golden hour remains loosely applied and increasingly investigated in the setting of AKI. With recent advances in critical care nephrology, including consensus definitions, improved risk stratification, and biomarkers, intensivists and nephrologists are ideally positioned to investigate how best to improve patient outcomes and decrease the severity of renal damage in the golden hours of early AKI (4-6).In the past, AKI research has focused on the earlier identification of AKI before the rise in serum creatinine or drop in urine output (7,8). Recently, investigators have shifted their focus beyond simply replacing serum creatinine with a new gold standard and have sought to augment the information provided by serum creatinine and urine output, combining them with biochemical biomarkers, functional assessment of urine-making capacity, or both (9-11). Although these studies and others have shown that functional and damage biomarkers with physiologic links to the kidney are useful tools in predicting the risk of progression of early AKI, they were part of observational studies and require additional investigation.Additionally, an increasing number of controlled trials has shown efficacy when attempting to prevent severe AKI. Judicious intravenous fluid selection of nonhyperchloremic solutions (12) and remote ischemic preconditioning (13) showed renoprotective effects, which decreased the incidence of severe AKI (regardless of the need for RRT). Similarly, a meta-analysis investigating perioperative hemodynamic optimization, Brienza et al. (14) showed that trials targeting both supranormal and normal hemodynamic targets decreased the risk of postoperative AKI. However, not every controlled trial targeting hemodynamics parameters has shown a clinical benefit in preventing AKI. Two recent large-scale multicenter investigations of resuscitation protocols in the setting of severe sepsis and septic shock showed relatively low severe AKI event rates (2.8%-13.5%) and no difference in the duration of treatment in those requiring RRT (15,16). Although the ideal resuscitation strategy, intravenous fluid selection, and hemodynamic parameters to prevent the development of AKI continue to take shape, much less is known about how best to treat and optimize the patient just entering the golden hours that follow a new diagnosis of AKI.For those with newly diagnosed AKI, there is a dearth of proven interventions to prevent AKI progression. Data surrounding the use of automated, electronic medical record alerts for those with new-onset AKI seemed promising at first (17,18), but when pati...