1982
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/35.3.629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement, recording, and assessment of skinfold thickness in childhood and adolescence: report of a small meeting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The biceps, triceps, and subscapular skin folds were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm with a Harpenden skinfold caliper (John Bull, British Indicators Ltd, St Albans, Herts, United Kingdom). 23 Body mass index (BMI) was calculated [weight (kg) divided by height squared (m 2 )]. Finnish age-and gender-matched references were used to assess the relative BMI in SDS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The biceps, triceps, and subscapular skin folds were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm with a Harpenden skinfold caliper (John Bull, British Indicators Ltd, St Albans, Herts, United Kingdom). 23 Body mass index (BMI) was calculated [weight (kg) divided by height squared (m 2 )]. Finnish age-and gender-matched references were used to assess the relative BMI in SDS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I $ easurements are often performed by large numbers of observers with less training and experience than their counterparts in previous field research, who often performed all measurements. For these reasons, a number of authors have called attention to the potential importance of measurement error in anthropometric variables (Martorell et al, 1975;Habicht et al, 1979;Hall et al, 1980;Branson et al, 1982;Owen, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In very obese individuals, the accurate measurement of skin fold thickness is not possible: however, the measurements occur in a range that largely exceeds the cut-off values used for screening, so screening performance is not af fected. In contrast to what is sometimes thought, skinfold thickness measurement errors are probably no greater in infants [97], As arm fat area is based on triceps skinfold thickness and mid-upper arm circumference, measure ment error is expected to be larger than for triceps skin fold thickness alone. Anthropometric prediction cqua-…”
Section: Validity Levelmentioning
confidence: 76%