Proceedings of the Applied Networking Research Workshop 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3106328.3106334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Vantage Point Selection Using A Similarity Metric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kumar et al considered the difference in coverage of IoT devices between inhome and Internet-wide scanning [38]. Holterbach et al investigate the similarity between results from topologically different RIPE Atlas nodes and find that probe selection can increase the number of discovered IPs by as much as 25% compared to the default RIPE Atlas probe selection, but did not investigate why this occurs [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al considered the difference in coverage of IoT devices between inhome and Internet-wide scanning [38]. Holterbach et al investigate the similarity between results from topologically different RIPE Atlas nodes and find that probe selection can increase the number of discovered IPs by as much as 25% compared to the default RIPE Atlas probe selection, but did not investigate why this occurs [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure overall similarity of a group, we use a generic vantage point similarity metric, which captures group similarity independently of the ultimate measurement target. To begin, we define the Jaccard similarity [24] of probe x with respect to another probe y as:…”
Section: Grouping Vantage Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where m is a destination IP, and P x →m is the path from x to m. As noted in [24], basing similarity upon paths to a single destination lacks robustness. To address this, we compare the similarity of paths to a set of destinations, M (where m ∈ M).…”
Section: Grouping Vantage Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%