2003
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.52.1.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Insulin Secretory Capacity and Glucose Tolerance to Predict Pancreatic β-Cell Mass In Vivo in the Nicotinamide/Streptozotocin Göttingen Minipig, a Model of Moderate Insulin Deficiency and Diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
48
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous reports, a reduction in beta cell mass of around 70% resulted in mild fasting hyperglycaemia and post-prandial hyperglycaemia in the present study [19,20]. The in vivo insulin secretory response to an MMTT after NIA+STZ was delayed rather than reduced, indicating that the remaining beta cells compensate for the reduced mass by secreting more insulin during a physiological stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with previous reports, a reduction in beta cell mass of around 70% resulted in mild fasting hyperglycaemia and post-prandial hyperglycaemia in the present study [19,20]. The in vivo insulin secretory response to an MMTT after NIA+STZ was delayed rather than reduced, indicating that the remaining beta cells compensate for the reduced mass by secreting more insulin during a physiological stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The in vivo insulin secretory response to an MMTT after NIA+STZ was delayed rather than reduced, indicating that the remaining beta cells compensate for the reduced mass by secreting more insulin during a physiological stimulus. However, when applying more extensive stimulation with a combination of glucose and arginine, the insulin response in this model has been shown to be clearly related to beta cell mass [20]. This difference could indicate that, during more extensive stimulation of insulin secretion (such as intravenous glucose plus arginine), beta cells in NIA+STZ animals are not able to compensate for the reduced beta cell mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, the parameters reflecting basal (fasting insulinaemia) or stimulated (maximal insulinaemia and AIR) insulin secretion were significantly correlated with the outcome of islet isolation. Interestingly, the two measures of stimulated insulin secretion, both of which have previously been shown to be highly correlated with pancreatic islet mass in the minipig [12] and in islet graft recipients [13], were highly predictive of the islet isolation yield in our model. These results confirm, for the first time in a large mammal, that the donor's endocrine mass is a major determinant of islet isolation outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although the amount of insulin/ C-peptide secreted after a glucose or meal challenge gives insight into insulin secretory capacity (4,9), these only indirectly reflect beta-cell mass and do not determine whether this mass is increasing or declining. For example, glucose homeostasis is unaffected until beta-cell mass is reduced to less than half its original value, presumably because of a large functional reserve capacity, and overt diabetes develops only when beta-cell mass is greatly reduced (10)(11)(12). Morphometric analysis of histological sections (13) requires removal of the pancreas to quantify beta-cell mass.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%