2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/713/2/1026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEASUREMENTS OF THE RATE OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE AT REDSHIFT ≲0.3 FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY II SUPERNOVA SURVEY

Abstract: We present a measurement of the volumetric Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) rate based on data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey II (SDSS-II) Supernova Survey. The adopted sample of supernovae (SNe) includes 516 SNe Ia at redshift z 0.3, of which 270(52%) are spectroscopically identified as SNe Ia. The remaining 246 SNe Ia were identified through their light curves; 113 of these objects have spectroscopic redshifts from spectra of their host galaxy, and 133 have photometric redshifts estimated from the SN light curve… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
130
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
12
130
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At low z we show the Ia rates from the LOSS (Li et al 2011a) and Cappellaro et al (1999). At slightly higher z we compare with the rates calculated from the SDSS supernova search (Dilday et al 2010b) and with the results from the STRESS (Botticella et al 2008). Rodney & Tonry (2010) presented revised Ia rates from the IfA Deep Survey out to z = 1.05 using new techniques, lower than those previously reported.…”
Section: Ia Supernova Ratesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At low z we show the Ia rates from the LOSS (Li et al 2011a) and Cappellaro et al (1999). At slightly higher z we compare with the rates calculated from the SDSS supernova search (Dilday et al 2010b) and with the results from the STRESS (Botticella et al 2008). Rodney & Tonry (2010) presented revised Ia rates from the IfA Deep Survey out to z = 1.05 using new techniques, lower than those previously reported.…”
Section: Ia Supernova Ratesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Neill et al 2006;Dahlen et al 2008) out to z ∼ 1.5 and core collapse supernovae (CC SNe) Bazin et al 2009) out to z ∼ 0.7. Large surveys targeting SNe of any type have also been successful in finding and characterising supernovae as well as determining both local and intermediate redshift cosmic supernova rates (Botticella et al 2008;Dilday et al 2010b;Li et al 2011b). Sharon et al (2010), Dilday et al (2010a), and Barbary et al (2012a) survey galaxy clusters, where the SN Ia rates are likely to be enhanced, to find supernovae and have reported cluster SN rates out to redshift 0.9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-band photometric identification is also now reliable: Dilday et al (2010) show that in the SDSS-II Supernova Survey only ∼2% of the photometric SNe Ia in z < 0.3 may be misidentified. Furthermore, the effects of dust become less important than at high redshifts (Botticella et al 2008).…”
Section: Sn Ia Rate Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filled points: those based on dedicated surveys using only spectroscopically identified SNe Ia. We also include select surveys with less than 100% spectroscopic identification, including the survey by SDSS which includes an order of magnitude more SNe Ia than any other survey (Dilday et al 2010), and measurements by Dahlen et al (2004Dahlen et al ( , 2008 which are the most reliable measurements in the high-redshift regime. 2.…”
Section: Sn Ia Rate Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volumetric SN Ia rates before completion of the CANDELS and CLASH SN surveys. Assorted ground-based surveys are plotted as white circles (Blanc et al 2004;Botticella et al 2008;Cappellaro et al 1999;Dilday et al 2010;Hardin et al 2000;Horesh et al 2008;Graur & Maoz 2013;Li et al 2011;Melinder et al 2012;Pain et al 2002;Perrett et al 2012;Rodney & Tonry 2010;Tonry et al 2003). Three high redshift SN surveys are highlighted: gray circles for the Subaru Deep Field (SDF; Graur et al 2011), blue downward triangles for volumetric (not cluster) rates from the Cluster Supernova Survey (CSS; Barbary et al 2012), and green upward triangles for the GOODS and PANS surveys (Dahlen et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%